atlas

Research map / Time series / Causal and generative time series

HR-Extreme: A High-Resolution Dataset for Extreme Weather Forecasting

ICLR 2025 · Time series › Causal and generative time series · approach: Robust forecasting and evaluation · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces HR-Extreme, a 3-km HRRR-based dataset of 17 extreme weather event types over the US, benchmarks NWP, Pangu, FuXi and a new HR-Heim model, and shows extreme-event errors far exceed general errors.

Problem

Deep learning and NWP weather forecasters are rarely evaluated on extreme weather, and existing datasets lack high resolution, event-type diversity, and precise location/time labels.

Approach

Builds a high-resolution (3 km, 320x320 crops, 69 variables) extreme-event dataset from HRRR by combining NOAA Storm Events, Storm Prediction Center reports clustered with DBSCAN, and manually filtered extreme temperatures, then proposes the HR-Heim baseline (causal-conv encoder, Swin transformer, progressive upsampling decoder) to forecast one hour ahead.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use HR-Heim instead of PanguWeather forecasting on HR-Extreme · HR-ExtremeRMSE: 10.42 -> 1.60Helped
Use HR-Heim instead of FuXiWeather forecasting on HR-Extreme · HR-ExtremeRMSE: 6.10 -> 1.60Helped
Use HR-Heim instead of NWPWeather forecasting on HR-Extreme · HR-ExtremeRMSE: 3.27 -> 1.60Helped
Evaluate on extreme cases rather than the original test setWeather forecasting models · PanguRMSE: 2.77 -> 10.42Hurt
Evaluate on extreme cases rather than the original test setWeather forecasting models · FuXiRMSE: 2.39 -> 6.10Hurt
Evaluate on extreme cases rather than the original test setWeather forecasting models · NWPRMSE: 2.35 -> 3.27Hurt
Evaluate on extreme cases rather than the original test setWeather forecasting models · HR-HeimRMSE: 1.40 -> 1.60Hurt
Use HR-Heim instead of NWPWeather forecasting on HR-Extreme across lead times 1–4 · HR-ExtremeRMSE: 3.27 -> 1.60; 4.12 -> 2.29; 5.20 -> 2.86; 6.04 -> 3.43Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: HRRR NOAA Storm Events Database NOAA Storm Prediction Center reports ERA5

Benchmarks: HR-Extreme HRRR original test set (July-December 2020)

Metrics: RMSE normalized RMSE

Baselines: NWP (WRF-ARW in HRRRv4) Pangu-Weather FuXi

Builds on: FuXi MagViTv2 Pangu-Weather Swin Transformer V2

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy