atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Mixture of experts

Mixture of In-Context Prompters for Tabular PFNs

ICLR 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Mixture of experts · approach: Sparse MoE as regularization and attention · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MixturePFN, combining a sparse mixture of K-Means-routed in-context prompters (MICP) for scalable PFN inference with CaPFN, adapter-based finetuning of TabPFN on bootstrapped downstream data, and reports it as the Condorcet winner on 36 TabZilla datasets.

Problem

In-context learning with prior-fitted networks (TabPFN) for tabular data has quadratic time and memory cost in training set size, so it cannot scale beyond about 3,000 samples, and its pretraining prior can mismatch the inference-time data distribution.

Approach

Route each test sample to one of K K-Means-based in-context prompters that each hold a fixed-size (B) support set so test samples can be batched into bounded prompts, and adapt the frozen PFN per dataset with linear adapters trained on bootstrapped sub-datasets drawn from the training data.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add MICP and CaPFN to TabPFN*TabPFN* · TabZilla 20 shared datasetsmean rank (log likelihood): 4.550 ± 2.747 -> 2.350 ± 1.824Helped
add CaPFN bootstrapped adapter finetuning (ablation)MixturePFN · 10 shared ablation datasetsmean rank: 5.10 ± 1.12 -> 2.75 ± 1.94Helped
add MICP instead of random sampling (ablation)TabPFN* with CaPFN · 10 shared ablation datasetsmean rank: 5.30 ± 1.59 -> 2.75 ± 1.94Helped
replace batched KNN prompts with MICP (ablation)MixturePFN · 10 shared ablation datasetsmean rank: 7.25 ± 3.70 -> 2.75 ± 1.94Helped
replace KNN prompting without ensembling with MICP (ablation)MixturePFN · 10 shared ablation datasetsmean rank: 4.00 ± 1.56 -> 2.75 ± 1.94Helped
use adapters instead of full finetuning (ablation)CaPFN · 10 shared ablation datasetsmean rank: 4.85 ± 2.03 -> 2.75 ± 1.94Helped
increase gamma from 1.0 to 3.0 (ablation)TabPFN* + MICP · TabZilla datasetsaccuracy: 83.96% -> 84.23%Helped
increase gamma from 3.0 to 5.0 (ablation)TabPFN* + MICP · TabZilla datasetsaccuracy: 84.23% -> 84.23%No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: TabZilla benchmark datasets (36 hardest classification datasets)

Benchmarks: TabZilla

Metrics: mean rank Condorcet votes/wins log-likelihood accuracy Wilcoxon signed-rank test

Baselines: TabPFN* XGBoost CatBoost LightGBM SAINT FTTransformer ResNet DANet

Builds on: TabPFN TabZilla Sparse Mixture of Experts KNN prompting

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy