atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Differential privacy

Optimal Best Arm Identification under Differential Privacy

NeurIPS 2025 · Federated learning and privacy › Differential privacy · approach: Local-DP and private estimation · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Closes most of the gap between lower and upper bounds for fixed-confidence best arm identification under global epsilon-DP for Bernoulli bandits, via a new d_epsilon-based lower bound, a geometric-grid private estimator with GLR stopping, and a DP Top Two sampler (DP-TT) matching the lower bound up to a constant below 8.

Problem

Fixed-confidence best arm identification with Bernoulli arms under global epsilon-differential privacy; existing lower and upper sample complexity bounds have a significant gap.

Approach

Replace the KL (non-private) or min{KL, eps TV} transportation cost with the d_epsilon divergence that interpolates between KL and epsilon-scaled TV, use it in a tighter lower bound, a GLR stopping rule and a Top Two sampler, and estimate means privately with arm-dependent geometric batching that does not forget past observations.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use DP-TT with the dε-inspired transportation costsFixed-confidence global-DP Bernoulli BAI · All tested Bernoulli instances and privacy budgets εempirical stopping timeHelped
Increase ε within the low-privacy regimeDP-TT · Bernoulli instances in the low-privacy regimeempirical stopping timeNo clear effect
Use DP-TT with (η,β)=(1,1/2)Fixed-confidence global-DP Bernoulli BAI · Bernoulli instances with distinct means, any εasymptotic expected sample complexity / log(1/δ): 4T^{\star}_{\epsilon, 1/2}(\boldsymbol{\nu}) \le 8T^{\star}_{\epsilon}(\boldsymbol{\nu})Helped
Use a fixed β=1/2 target allocation instead of the unconstrained optimal allocationTop Two sampling · Bernoulli instances with distinct meanscharacteristic time: T^{\star}_{\epsilon,1/2}(\bm \nu) \le 2 T^{\star}_{\epsilon}(\bm \nu)Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Benchmarks: Bernoulli instance mu1=(0.95,0.9,0.9,0.9,0.5) Bernoulli instance mu2=(0.75,0.7,0.7,0.7,0.7)

Metrics: empirical stopping time (sample complexity)

Baselines: AdaP-TT AdaP-TT* DP-SE EB-TCI-beta (non-private)

Builds on: Top Two sampling Track-and-Stop AdaP-TT d_epsilon divergence (regret minimisation) Laplace mechanism

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy