atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Quantization

Adaptive Dataset Quantization

AAAI 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Quantization · approach: Post-training weight quantization · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Adaptive Dataset Quantization (ADQ), which adaptively samples from DQ bins using texture-level representativeness and contrastive-learning diversity scores to compress datasets.

Problem

Dataset compression methods are limited: dataset distillation is computationally expensive and generalizes poorly across architectures, while coreset selection has low data keep ratios and relies on heuristics; the naive Dataset Quantization (DQ) samples uniformly from bins, ignoring their varying i

Approach

Scores each DQ bin with a texture-level representativeness score and a contrastive-learning diversity score, combines them into an importance score, and samples from each bin in proportion to importance and bin size instead of uniformly.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace uniform sampling with adaptive sampling using bin importanceDQ (ADQ) · CIFAR-10, 10% keep ratioaccuracy: +2.6Helped
replace uniform sampling with adaptive sampling using bin importanceDQ (ADQ) · CIFAR-10, 20% keep ratioaccuracy: +2.8Helped
replace uniform sampling with adaptive sampling using bin importanceDQ (ADQ) · CIFAR-10, 30% keep ratioaccuracy: +3.3Helped
add RS (ablation)DQ · CIFAR-10, 10%, 20%, and 30% keep ratiosaccuracy: 84.1 -> 85.1; 87.6 -> 88.8; 91.0 -> 93.0Helped
add DS (ablation)DQ · CIFAR-10, 10%, 20%, and 30% keep ratiosaccuracy: 84.1 -> 85.3; 87.6 -> 88.9; 91.0 -> 93.1Helped
add IS (RS+DS) (ablation)DQ · CIFAR-10, 10%, 20%, and 30% keep ratiosaccuracy: 84.1 -> 86.2; 87.6 -> 90.4; 91.0 -> 94.2Helped
add RS, DS, or IS (RS+DS) (ablation)DQ · CIFAR-10, 100% keep ratioaccuracy: 95.6 -> 95.6No clear effect
vary alpha from 0 toward 1 to weight bin importance in sampling (ablation)ADQ · CIFAR-10accuracyMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet-1K Tiny-ImageNet

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 ImageNet-1K

Metrics: test accuracy average accuracy across architectures GPU hours error bars

Baselines: DM DQ GraphCut

Builds on: Dataset Quantization GraphCut Dataset Distillation Masked Autoencoder

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy