atlas

Research map / Video / Video segmentation and tracking

ROSE: Remove Objects with Side Effects in Videos

NeurIPS 2025 · Video › Video segmentation and tracking · approach: Layered video decomposition and dynamics · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces ROSE, a video object-removal inpainting model built on Wan2.1 that is trained on Unreal Engine-rendered paired videos and predicts side-effect (difference) masks, and a new ROSE-Bench benchmark.

Problem

Video object removal fails to erase object side effects (shadows, reflections, lighting, translucency, mirror reflections) because paired real video data with and without these effects is scarce.

Approach

Generate aligned paired video data with a 3D engine covering five side-effect categories, feed the whole original video as reference (instead of masking out the object) into a diffusion transformer inpainting model, augment masks, and add an auxiliary difference-mask prediction loss that localizes side-effect regions.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use the complete input video as reference guidance instead of masked-video inputROSE · ROSE-Bench synthetic pairedPSNRHelped
add mask region guidance (ablation)ROSE · ROSE-Bench synthetic paired (Mean)PSNR: 27.28 -> 30.84Helped
add mask augmentation (ablation)ROSE · ROSE-Bench synthetic paired (Mean)PSNR: 27.28 -> 29.89Helped
add the difference mask predictor to the mask-augmentation variant (ablation)ROSE · ROSE-Bench synthetic paired (Mean)PSNR: 29.89 -> 31.12Helped
use ROSE instead of ProPainterVideo object removal · ROSE-Bench synthetic paired (Mean)PSNR: 27.1991 -> 31.1221Helped
use ROSE instead of ProPainterVideo object removal · ROSE-Bench realistic pairedPSNR: 32.81 -> 31.34Hurt
use ROSE instead of ProPainterVideo object removal · ROSE-Bench realistic pairedSSIM: 0.917 -> 0.923Helped
use ROSE instead of DiffuEraserVideo object removal · ROSE-Bench realistic unpairedImaging Quality: 0.658 -> 0.630Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Unreal Engine rendered synthetic video pairs DAVIS

Benchmarks: ROSE-Bench synthetic paired ROSE-Bench realistic paired ROSE-Bench realistic unpaired

Metrics: PSNR SSIM LPIPS VBench motion smoothness VBench background consistency VBench temporal flickering VBench subject consistency VBench imaging quality

Baselines: DiffuEraser ProPainter FuseFormer FloED FGT

Builds on: Wan2.1 DiffuEraser ProPainter BrushNet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy