atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Knowledge distillation

Learning Task-Agnostic Representations through Multi-Teacher Distillation

NeurIPS 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Knowledge distillation · approach: Few-shot and metric distillation · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a task-agnostic multi-teacher distillation objective that minimizes the conditional entropy of teacher embeddings given student embeddings, estimated with Gaussian kernels, and releases student embedders for text, molecules and vision.

Problem

Distilling several diverse pretrained embedders into one compact student that works across unseen downstream tasks without task labels; existing multi-teacher feature distillation (MSE, cosine) is task-tailored or unstable in high dimensions.

Approach

Bounds the disagreement between Bayes classifiers on student and teacher embeddings by the conditional differential entropy of teacher embeddings given the student embedding, yielding a task-agnostic loss: the negative log-likelihood of each teacher embedding under a learned per-teacher Gaussian kernel conditioned on the student embedding.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace MSE distillation with NLL (Gaussian kernel conditional entropy) distillationsnowflake student embedders (xs, s, m, l) from 4 teachers · MTEB classification (33-task subset)average accuracy: +1.1 to +7.1 points across sizesHelped
Distill from multiple teachers (8) instead of 1 or 2 (ablation)GIN student on TDC ADMET and HTS · TDC regression and classificationaverage R2 / AUROC: regression avg R2 0.405 (1 teacher) -> 0.476 (8 teachers)Helped
Use NLL instead of MSE or cosine distillation with 8 teachersGIN student on TDC ADMET and HTS · TDC average rankaverage rank: avg rank 3.72 (NLL) vs 5.13 (Cosine) and 6.15 (MSE)Helped
Use NLL instead of MSE for xs-size studentssnowflake xs student · MTEB classification (33-task subset)average accuracy: 74.0 vs 72.9Helped
Distill with BBB-type task where teacher-student distribution shift is large (ablation)GIN student with 8 teachers vs 1-2 teachers · TDC BBB classificationAUROC: slightly lower average than 1 or 2 teacher students on BBBHurt
Use NLL distillation instead of MSE on the molecular studentGIN student with 8 teachers · TDC ADMET classification and regressionaverage rank: consistently outperforms MSE and Cosine on all categories (text summary)Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Specter T5 Amazon QA IMDB SNLI Quora QQP AG News MEDI DAIR Emotion MOSES ZINC-250k DTD

Benchmarks: MTEB (33 tasks: classification, clustering, STS) TDC ADMET and HTS (32 tasks) fine-grained vision classification

Metrics: accuracy AUROC R^2 average rank

Baselines: MSE distillation Cosine distillation CompRess bge-small-en-v1.5 GIST bge-base-en-v1.5 bge-large-en-v1.5 ChemBERTa-MTR-77M 3D-infomax GraphMVP

Builds on: Snowflake Arctic-Embed (GIST-based) SimReg CompRess Gaussian-mixture conditional entropy estimator

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy