atlas

Research map / Optimization / Nonconvex and smooth optimization

Large Stepsizes Accelerate Gradient Descent for Regularized Logistic Regression

NeurIPS 2025 · Optimization › Nonconvex and smooth optimization · approach: Coordinate and Adam convergence analysis · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that constant-stepsize gradient descent on l2-regularized logistic regression with separable data can exploit large (edge-of-stability) stepsizes to reach Nesterov-like O~(sqrt(kappa)) step complexity, with a matching critical stepsize threshold.

Problem

Gradient descent with a constant stepsize is usually analyzed in the stable regime, giving O(kappa) step complexity for strongly convex problems; it is unclear whether large, nonmonotone (edge-of-stability) stepsizes help for l2-regularized logistic regression, where the minimizer is finite unlike u

Approach

Large constant stepsizes push GD into an edge-of-stability phase that is nonmonotone but then transitions to a stable phase, yielding exponential convergence in O~(1/sqrt(lambda)) steps for small regularization and O~(1/lambda^{2/3}) for general regularization; the largest convergent stepsize is characterized as Theta(1/(lambda ln(1/lambda))).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use a large constant stepsize in the EoS regime instead of a stable-regime small stepsizeGD for ℓ2-regularized logistic regression with small regularization · Linearly separable data; λ≲1/n²steps to ε error: Ocal(ln(1/ε)/λ) -> Ocal(ln(1/ε)/√λ)Helped
Use a large constant stepsize in the EoS regime instead of a stable-regime small stepsizeGD for ℓ2-regularized logistic regression with general regularization · Linearly separable datasteps to ε error: Ocal(ln(1/ε)/λ) -> Ocal(ln(1/ε)/λ^{2/3})Helped
Use a large stepsize η=Θ((γ²n)^{1/3}) rather than η=1GD with λ=1/n · Population risk, separable distributionsteps to population risk Otilde(1/n): Ocal(n ln n) -> Ocal((n/γ)^{2/3}ln n)Helped
Use regularization λ=1/n and a large stepsize rather than unregularized GD with η=Θ(1)GD · Population risk, separable distributionsteps to population risk Otilde(1/n): Ocal(n) -> Ocal((n/γ)^{2/3}ln n)Mixed
Use Nesterov's momentum instead of large-stepsize GDGD with λ=1/n · Population risk, separable distributionsteps to population risk Otilde(1/n): Ocal(n^{1/2} ln n ) vs Ocal((n/γ)^{2/3}ln n)Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: step complexity objective gap population risk bound

Baselines: stable-regime gradient descent Nesterov's momentum adaptive gradient descent silver stepsize schedule

Builds on: edge of stability analysis of logistic regression (Wu et al.) split optimization lemma Nesterov momentum

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy