atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Human and embodied modeling

Connectome-Based Modelling Reveals Orientation Maps in the Drosophila Optic Lobe

NeurIPS 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Human and embodied modeling · approach: fMRI visual decoding · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Simulates the full FAFB fly connectome with a conductance-based LIF model driven by bar stimuli to show spatially organised orientation maps and columns in the Drosophila optic lobe.

Problem

Whether map-like orientation representations (orientation maps and columns) can emerge in the non-cortical Drosophila optic lobe, given only connectome-constrained dynamics.

Approach

Drives a whole-brain FAFB connectome (138,639 neurons, 1.5M synapses) with a conductance-based LIF model using OFF-bar stimuli injected into L1-L3, fits circular Gaussians to firing-rate tuning, and maps preferred orientations spatially to reveal pinwheel-like maps and columns.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
silence Tm neurons (ablation)Connectome-constrained LIF model · Dmwell-fit neurons remaining: 100% -> 90.7%Hurt
silence Tm neurons (ablation)Connectome-constrained LIF model · Pmwell-fit neurons remaining: 100% -> 10.4%Hurt
silence Mi neurons (ablation)Connectome-constrained LIF model · Dmwell-fit neurons remaining: 100% -> 2.4%Hurt
silence Mi neurons (ablation)Connectome-constrained LIF model · Pmwell-fit neurons remaining: 100% -> 3.9%Hurt
include Dm3 and Dm15 neurons in the orientation-map analysis (ablation)Dm orientation-map analysis · Dmorientation-map spatial organizationNo clear effect
increase LIF parameter perturbation from 10% to 50% (ablation)Connectome-constrained LIF model · optic-lobe orientation tuningorientation selectivityHurt
perturb LIF parameters by 10% (ablation)Connectome-constrained LIF model · optic-lobe orientation mapspreferred-orientation map structureNo clear effect
decrease L1 input gain A1 by 20% (ablation)Connectome-constrained LIF model · optic-lobe orientation tuningpreferred-orientation differenceNo clear effect
decrease L2 input gain A2 by 20% (ablation)Connectome-constrained LIF model · optic-lobe orientation tuningpreferred-orientation differenceNo clear effect
decrease L3 input gain A3 by 20% (ablation)Connectome-constrained LIF model · optic-lobe orientation tuningpreferred-orientation differenceNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: FAFB (full adult fly brain) connectome calcium imaging data for L1-L3 gain fitting

Metrics: R^2 of circular Gaussian fit normalised RSS absolute difference between structural and simulated preferr circular standard deviation within columns ablation percentage of well-fit neurons

Baselines: Seung's dendritic-wiring orientation prediction shuffled-orientation null baseline

Builds on: FAFB connectome conductance-based leaky integrate-and-fire model

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy