atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

AUTE: Peer-Alignment and Self-Unlearning Boost Adversarial Robustness for Training Ensemble Models

AAAI 2025 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Robustness-accuracy trade-off analysis · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes AUTE, which combines adversarial training with ensemble learning via peer-alignment (round-robin KL alignment of each member to a frozen peer ensemble) and self-unlearning (down-weighted CE on over-confident examples), improving robust accuracy of ResNet-20 ensembles on CIFAR-10 and other datasets.

Problem

Simple combinations of adversarial training and ensemble learning can fail to improve, and sometimes degrade, adversarial robustness of ensemble models.

Approach

Partition the ensemble into a frozen large peer model and one optimized member, align the member to the peer via selectively weighted KL divergence, and apply a self-unlearning loss that down-weights over-confident (large-margin) examples; iterate in round-robin over members.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add Peer-Alignment (ablation)AUTE ensemble · CIFAR-10, 3-member ResNet-20clean accuracy (%): 76.7 -> 79.0Helped
add Peer-Alignment (ablation)AUTE ensemble · CIFAR-10, 3-member ResNet-20Avg robust accuracy (%): 54.4 -> 54.8Helped
add Self-Unlearning (ablation)AUTE ensemble · CIFAR-10, 3-member ResNet-20Avg robust accuracy (%): 50.3 -> 54.8Helped
remove sample-selective alignment weights (ablation)AUTE ensemble · CIFAR-10, 3-member ResNet-20Avg robust accuracy (%): 54.4 -> 54.8Hurt
replace Peer-Alignment with ADP diversification (ablation)AUTE ensemble · CIFAR-10, 3-member ResNet-20Avg robust accuracy (%): 45.0 -> 54.8Hurt
replace Self-Unlearning with label smoothing (λ=0.1) (ablation)AUTE ensemble · CIFAR-10, 3-member ResNet-20Avg robust accuracy (%): 48.5 -> 54.8Hurt
replace Self-Unlearning with label smoothing (λ=0.3) (ablation)AUTE ensemble · CIFAR-10, 3-member ResNet-20Avg robust accuracy (%): 49.0 -> 54.8Hurt
replace Self-Unlearning with label smoothing (λ=0.5) (ablation)AUTE ensemble · CIFAR-10, 3-member ResNet-20Avg robust accuracy (%): 49.2 -> 54.8Hurt
increase label-smoothing coefficient (ablation)AUTE-LS · CIFAR-10, 3-member ResNet-20clean accuracy (%): 79.2 -> 79.1 -> 78.6Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 MNIST CIFAR-100 Tiny-ImageNet

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 MNIST CIFAR-100 Tiny-ImageNet

Metrics: clean accuracy robust accuracy

Baselines: TRADES MART HAT STAT MCE AROW ADP GAL DVERGE TRS

Builds on: TRADES MART ADP DVERGE MCE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy