atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

Pixel-Perfect Depth with Semantics-Prompted Diffusion Transformers

NeurIPS 2025 · Image generation › Autoregressive and latent generation · approach: High-resolution diffusion synthesis · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Pixel-Perfect Depth performs monocular depth estimation via flow-matching diffusion transformers directly in pixel space (no VAE), using semantics-prompted DiT and a cascade patch-size design to avoid flying pixels at edges.

Problem

Generative depth estimators that fine-tune Stable Diffusion compress depth maps with a VAE, which introduces flying pixels at object edges and fine details when converted to point clouds; naive pixel-space diffusion is hard to optimize.

Approach

Train a diffusion transformer from scratch directly in pixel space, inject L2-normalized semantic features from a frozen vision foundation model encoder into the DiT tokens (SP-DiT), and use a coarse-to-fine cascade that starts with large patches and halves patch size in later blocks (Cas-DiT).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add SP-DiT semantic prompting to vanilla DiT (ablation)Pixel-Perfect Depth · NYUv2AbsRel: 22.5 -> 4.8Helped
add Cas-DiT to SP-DiT (ablation)Pixel-Perfect Depth · NYUv2AbsRel: 4.8 -> 4.3Helped
add Cas-DiT to SP-DiT (ablation)Pixel-Perfect Depth · inferencetime (s): 0.20 -> 0.14Helped
use a pretrained vision encoder for SP-DiT rather than no semantic prompting (ablation)Pixel-Perfect Depth · NYUv2AbsRel: 22.5 -> 6.4Helped
use VGGT rather than MAE as the SP-DiT encoder (ablation)Pixel-Perfect Depth · NYUv2AbsRel: 6.4 -> 4.7Helped
use a smaller DiT-Small-based PPD variant (ablation)Pixel-Perfect Depth · RuntimeTime (ms): 140 -> 40Helped
use a smaller DiT-Small-based PPD variant (ablation)Pixel-Perfect Depth · NYUv2AbsRel: 4.3 -> 4.5Hurt
use pixel-space diffusion rather than VAE-reconstructed depthPixel-Perfect Depth · Hypersim testChamfer Dist.: 0.12 -> 0.08Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Hypersim UrbanSyn UnrealStereo4K VKITTI TartanAir NYUv2 KITTI ETH3D ScanNet DIODE

Benchmarks: NYUv2 KITTI ETH3D ScanNet DIODE Hypersim

Metrics: AbsRel delta_1 Chamfer Distance (edge-aware point cloud) inference time

Baselines: Marigold GeoWizard DepthFM GenPercept Lotus Depth Anything v2 DepthPro MoGe MiDaS Omnidata DPT REPA

Builds on: DiT Flow Matching REPA Marigold

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy