atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / LLM agents

WebDancer: Towards Autonomous Information Seeking Agency

NeurIPS 2025 · Multi-agent systems and games › LLM agents · approach: Agentic benchmarks and orchestration · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Presents WebDancer, a four-stage pipeline (browsing QA synthesis, trajectory rejection sampling, SFT cold start, DAPO-based RL) for training ReAct-style web information-seeking agents, evaluated on GAIA and WebWalkerQA.

Problem

Existing web information-seeking agents are trained on simple, saturated QA datasets (e.g., 2Wiki above 80%) and lack an effective end-to-end training recipe for deep, multi-step research behavior comparable to Deep Research.

Approach

A data-centric, training-stage pipeline: synthesize deep QA via crawled web pages (CrawlQA) and easy-to-hard refinement (E2HQA), sample Short-CoT (GPT-4o) and Long-CoT (QwQ-Plus) ReAct trajectories with rejection sampling and multi-stage filtering, cold-start with SFT that masks observation tokens, then on-policy RL with DAPO using a binary LLM-judge answer reward.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
apply WebDancer training rather than Vanilla ReActQwQ-32B · GAIAPass@1 (Avg.): 37.8 -> 51.5Helped
apply WebDancer training rather than Vanilla ReActQwQ-32B · WebWalkerQAPass@1 (Avg.): 24.1 -> 47.9Helped
apply WebDancer training rather than Vanilla ReActQwen-2.5-7B · GAIAPass@1 (Avg.): 18.4 -> 31.0Helped
apply WebDancer training rather than Vanilla ReActQwen-2.5-7B · WebWalkerQAPass@1 (Avg.): 24.2 -> 36.0Helped
apply WebDancer training rather than Vanilla ReActQwen-2.5-32B · GAIAPass@1 (Avg.): 31.0 -> 40.7Helped
apply WebDancer training rather than Vanilla ReActQwen-2.5-32B · WebWalkerQAPass@1 (Avg.): 31.9 -> 38.4Helped
remove SFT cold start before RL (ablation)QwQ agent · GAIAPass@3: only 5%Hurt
train with Long-CoT rather than Short-CoT (ablation)QwQ-32B · GAIAPass@3: 44.66 -> 58.25Helped
train with Long-CoT rather than Short-CoT (ablation)Qwen2.5-7B · GAIAinvalid rate: 0.65% -> 21.36%Hurt
mix Short-CoT and Long-CoT training data (ablation)WebDancer · GAIAperformanceNo clear effect
use the final filtered trajectory dataset rather than less-filtered variants (ablation)QwQ agent SFT · GAIAperformanceHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CrawlQA E2HQA MuSiQue Bamboogle PopQA 2Wiki HotpotQA SimpleQA-style seed QA

Benchmarks: GAIA WebWalkerQA BrowseComp BrowseComp-zh

Metrics: Pass@1 Pass@3 Cons@3

Baselines: Vanilla ReAct OpenAI Deep Research Search-o1 WebThinker R1-Searcher Simple DS GPT-4o DeepSeek-R1-671B QwQ-32B RAG

Builds on: ReAct DAPO Search-o1 WebThinker R1-Searcher SimpleDeepSearcher

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy