atlas

Research map / Continual learning / Online and replay-based

SPICED: A Synaptic Homeostasis-Inspired Framework for Unsupervised Continual EEG Decoding

NeurIPS 2025 · Continual learning › Online and replay-based · approach: Gradient projection and plasticity preservation · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes SPICED, a synaptic-homeostasis-inspired synaptic network that performs unsupervised continual EEG decoding across new individuals via critical memory reactivation, synaptic consolidation, and renormalization.

Problem

Unsupervised continual EEG decoding where new individuals with inter-individual variability arrive sequentially, requiring adaptation (plasticity) without catastrophic forgetting (stability).

Approach

A synaptic network of individual-specific nodes linked by feature similarity; critical nodes are reactivated by an importance score, their models fused for initialization, their connection strengths consolidated (capped at 3), and all strengths globally downscaled with Ebbinghaus-style time-dependent decay.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use SPICED instead of the strongest listed baselineUnsupervised continual EEG decoding · ISRUC, 10%/30%/50% sourceACC: 60.6±0.71 -> 62.6±1.35; 74.8±0.11 -> 75.6±0.13; 73.9±0.29 -> 74.5±0.39Helped
use SPICED instead of the strongest listed baselineUnsupervised continual EEG decoding · FACED, 10%/30%/50% sourceACC: 25.0±0.43 -> 25.7±0.10; 41.4±1.50 -> 43.7±0.51; 48.7±0.66 -> 48.9±0.42Helped
use SPICED instead of the strongest listed baselineUnsupervised continual EEG decoding · Physionet-MI, 10%/30%/50% sourceACC: 43.1±0.33 -> 43.4±0.44; 48.3±0.38 -> 48.7±0.17; 52.5±0.36 -> 52.4±0.11Mixed
remove synaptic renormalization (only consolidation remains) (ablation)SPICED · three EEG datasets, 30% sourceperformanceHurt
remove synaptic consolidation (only renormalization remains) (ablation)SPICED · three EEG datasets, 30% sourceperformanceHurt
vary connection threshold ξ (ablation)SPICED · ISRUC, 30% sourceACC: 75.5 (ξ=0.1); 74.9 (ξ=0.2); 75.0 (ξ=0.3); 74.1 (ξ=0.4); 73.4 (ξ=0.5); 73.9 (ξ=0.6)Mixed
vary connection threshold ξ (ablation)SPICED · FACED, 30% sourceACC: 43.7 (ξ=0.1); 43.9 (ξ=0.2); 43.6 (ξ=0.3); 44.2 (ξ=0.4); 43.7 (ξ=0.5); 43.5 (ξ=0.6)Mixed
vary connection threshold ξ (ablation)SPICED · Physionet-MI, 30% sourceACC: 48.7 (ξ=0.1); 48.8 (ξ=0.2); 48.6 (ξ=0.3); 48.6 (ξ=0.4); 48.9 (ξ=0.5); 48.7 (ξ=0.6)Mixed
increase Gaussian noise up to 10% of signal standard deviation (ablation)SPICED · ISRUC, 30% sourceACC: 75.6±0.13 -> 73.8±0.26Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ISRUC FACED Physionet-MI

Benchmarks: ISRUC FACED Physionet-MI

Metrics: accuracy macro-F1

Baselines: MMD EWC UCL-GV ReSNT CoUDA BrainUICL

Builds on: BrainUICL Contrastive Predictive Coding Elastic Weight Consolidation

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy