atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Self-supervised and contrastive

GreenHyperSpectra: A multi-source hyperspectral dataset for global vegetation trait prediction

NeurIPS 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Self-supervised and contrastive · approach: Self-supervised neuroimaging representations · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces GreenHyperSpectra, a multi-source hyperspectral pretraining dataset (~140k canopy spectra), and benchmarks semi- and self-supervised models (SR-GAN, RTM-AE, MAE) against a supervised EfficientNet-based CNN for multi-output plant trait regression.

Problem

Plant trait prediction from hyperspectral data suffers from label scarcity and domain shifts across sensors and ecosystems, and existing benchmarks are single-sensor and lack semi/self-supervised multi-output evaluation.

Approach

Pretrain on a large unlabeled, cross-sensor, cross-ecosystem spectral dataset and adapt semi- and self-supervised methods (GAN, RTM-physics autoencoder, masked autoencoder) for simultaneous multi-trait regression, evaluated in-distribution, half-range, and out-of-distribution settings.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Pretrain on GreenHyperSpectra and fine-tune MAE instead of training the supervised baselineFull-range trait prediction · Full-range trait predictionaverage R^2: 0.587 (± 0.010) -> 0.641 (± 0.020)Helped
Use full fine-tuning rather than linear probing (ablation)MAE pretrained on full-range spectra · Full-range trait predictionaverage R^2: 0.466 (± 0.008) -> 0.641 (± 0.020)Helped
Pretrain on full-range spectra and fine-tune for half-range inputs rather than train the supervised baseline on half-range dataHalf-range trait prediction · Half-range trait predictionaverage R^2: 0.163 { (± 0.084)} -> 0.566 { (± 0.015)}Helped
Pretrain on full-range rather than half-range spectra before fine-tuning with half-range inputs (ablation)MAE · Half-range trait predictionaverage R^2: 0.465 { (± 0.040)} -> 0.566 { (± 0.015)}Helped
Pretrain on GreenHyperSpectra and fine-tune MAE rather than train the supervised baselineOOD trait prediction · OOD cross-dataset evaluationaverage R^2: 0.24 vs. 0.31Helped
Increase the quantity of unlabeled pretraining data (ablation)Semi- and self-supervised models · Trait predictionR^2No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: GreenHyperSpectra aggregated annotated plant trait dataset (7,900 spectra, 50 experiments)

Benchmarks: GreenHyperSpectra trait-annotated dataset (7,900 spectra, 7 traits)

Metrics: R^2 nRMSE

Baselines: Supervised CNN (EfficientNet-B0-based) SR-GAN RTM-AE MAE linear probing

Builds on: masked autoencoder SR-GAN PROSAIL-PRO EfficientNet-B0

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy