atlas

Research map / Large language models / AI and society

Machine Unlearning Doesn't Do What You Think: Lessons for Generative AI Policy and Research

NeurIPS 2025 · Large language models › AI and society · approach: Human-centered trust and agency · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

A position paper arguing that machine unlearning, as used for generative AI, conflates targeted removal of training data with output suppression, and identifying five mismatches that limit what unlearning can achieve for copyright, privacy, and safety policy.

Problem

Unlearning is widely proposed for generative AI to address privacy, copyright, and safety issues, but its technical methods (removal from parameters vs. suppression of outputs) do not match the goals that policymakers and researchers attach to them.

Approach

Separates unlearning into targeted removal of observed training data and targeted suppression of latent information in outputs, then articulates five conceptual mismatches between these technical methods and legal/policy aims, with implications for U.S. copyright, privacy, and safety.

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: arXiv unlearning papers (bibliometric analysis in appendix)

Builds on: GDPR Article 17 exact unlearning WMDP benchmark

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy