atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Exploring Polyglot Harmony: On Multilingual Data Allocation for Large Language Models Pretraining

NeurIPS 2025 · Large language models › Language, safety and interpretability · approach: Multilingual LLM data and culture · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CLIMB, a scaling-law framework with a cross-lingual interaction-aware language ratio and a two-step optimizer to pick multilingual pretraining language proportions, validated with 1.2B and 7B models trained on 1T tokens of FineWeb-2.

Problem

Choosing optimal language proportions in multilingual LLM pretraining is hard because languages interact through cross-lingual transfer and optimal ratios shift with data scale, while retraining for each mixture is prohibitively expensive.

Approach

Defines a cross-lingual interaction-aware language ratio (the monolingual token budget equivalent to a language's multilingual validation loss, divided by total budget), models it parametrically with pairwise transfer terms inside a per-language scaling law, and finds allocations via a two-step procedure: marginal-benefit balancing for direction, then constrained magnitude maximization.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use CLIMB-derived language allocation instead of alternative allocation strategiesLLaMA-2 1.2B · Multilingual benchmarks (XNLI, XCOPA, XStoryCloze, FLORES, GMMLU, JMMLU, VMLU, XWinograd, XHS, XARC-E, XARC-C, XGPQA, XTQA)benchmark scoreMixed
Use the cross-lingual interaction-aware scaling law instead of MSLMultilingual validation-loss prediction · 2-language LLM, 100B tokensR²: 0.832 -> 0.978Helped
Use the cross-lingual interaction-aware scaling law instead of MSLMultilingual validation-loss prediction · 2-language LLM, 100B tokensHuber loss (× 10^-3): 5.61 -> 0.518Helped
Increase training data budget above 25B tokensCLIMB scaling-law prediction · Scaling-law applicabilitypredictive accuracyHelped
Increase token budget from smaller scales to larger scalesCross-lingual interaction-aware ratio · Multilingual pretrainingcross-lingual transfer strengthHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: FineWeb-2

Benchmarks: XNLI XCOPA XStoryCloze Flores GMMLU CMMLU JMMLU VMLU XWinograd XHS XARC-E XARC-C

Metrics: R^2 Huber loss accuracy chrF++

Baselines: Isolated MSL Uniform Natural proportions LLaMA-3.2-1B Gemma-3-1B-pt Qwen-3-1.7B-base

Builds on: Chinchilla scaling laws multilingual scaling law (MSL) DoReMi

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy