atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Conformal Prediction in The Loop: A Feedback-Based Uncertainty Model for Trajectory Optimization

NeurIPS 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Prediction-powered and conformal inference · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Feedback-Based Conformal Prediction (Fb-CP) that feeds realized trajectories back into CP-based risk allocation for shrinking-horizon trajectory optimization under a joint chance constraint, with an iterative risk allocation (IRA) algorithm.

Problem

Existing CP-based trajectory optimization uses prediction regions sequentially, so realized decisions cannot feed back to adjust the regions, leaving conservatism in collision-avoidance planning under uncertain obstacle motion.

Approach

Compute a posterior violation probability from realized states using a held-out calibration subset, reclaim the unused risk (alpha minus beta) and reallocate it to future time steps, either evenly (ARA) or iteratively via an active/inactive constraint scheme (IRA), while preserving coverage guarantees.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add feedback-based posterior risk adjustment using ARASequential CP · Quadrotor model, α=0.05–0.20average cost: 17.321 -> 15.356 (α=0.05); 16.17 -> 14.228 (α=0.10); 14.83 -> 12.354 (α=0.15); 13.217 -> 10.22 (α=0.20)Helped
use iterative rather than average risk allocation (ablation)Fb-CP · Quadrotor model, α=0.05–0.20average cost: 15.356 -> 7.189 (α=0.05); 14.228 -> 6.798 (α=0.10); 12.354 -> 6.191 (α=0.15); 10.22 -> 5.398 (α=0.20)Helped
add feedback-based posterior risk adjustment using ARASequential CP · Kinematic vehicle model, α=0.05–0.20average cost: 22.20 -> 20.46 (α=0.05); 20.24 -> 18.78 (α=0.10); 19.22 -> 17.35 (α=0.15); 17.05 -> 15.13 (α=0.20)Helped
use iterative rather than average risk allocation (ablation)Fb-CP · Kinematic vehicle model, α=0.05–0.20average cost: 20.46 -> 4.77 (α=0.05); 18.78 -> 3.52 (α=0.10); 17.35 -> 3.18 (α=0.15); 15.13 -> 2.89 (α=0.20)Helped
use iterative rather than average risk allocation (ablation)Fb-CP · Quadrotor modelaverage computation time: 0.022 -> 0.038; 0.020 -> 0.039; 0.021 -> 0.037; 0.020 -> 0.036Hurt
add feedback-based posterior risk adjustment using ARASequential CP · Kinematic vehicle modelaverage computation time: 0.111 -> 0.100 (α=0.05); 0.093 -> 0.087 (α=0.10); 0.078 -> 0.085 (α=0.15); 0.076 -> 0.078 (α=0.20)No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: TrajNet++ generated obstacle trajectories Stanford Drone Dataset

Benchmarks: kinematic vehicle model simulation linear quadrotor simulation dynamic bicycle model Stanford Drone Dataset

Metrics: average cost computation time collision avoidance rate

Baselines: Conformal Control (CC) ACI for Motion Planning (ACI-MP) Recursively Feasible MPC using CP (RF-CP) Sequential CP (S-CP) Fb-CP with ARA

Builds on: Conformal prediction Sequential CP Iterative risk allocation ACI

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy