atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

Next Semantic Scale Prediction via Hierarchical Diffusion Language Models

NeurIPS 2025 · Image generation › Autoregressive and latent generation · approach: Latent diffusion with learned tokenizers · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes HDLM, a discrete diffusion language model whose forward process moves tokens through a hierarchical cluster vocabulary before masking, enabling time-varying next-semantic-scale prediction with a closed-form ELBO that reduces to MDLM when there is one cluster.

Problem

Masked discrete diffusion gives all masked tokens identical embeddings and cannot self-correct decoded tokens, while uniform diffusion underperforms; a discrete diffusion LM with richer intermediate noise states and self-correction is needed.

Approach

Insert intermediate cluster hierarchies between clean words and the mask token (x -> c -> m), where each token is surjectively mapped to a coarser cluster token, and train with a closed-form CTMC ELBO that decomposes into cluster-level and token-level cross-entropy terms; optional stochastic cluster corruption and forced within-cluster transitions improve robustness.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use HDLM-small-64 instead of MDLM-smallSmall discrete diffusion language model · OWTValid. PPL: ≤27.39 -> ≤23.36Helped
Use HDLM-small-64 instead of MDLM-smallSmall discrete diffusion language model · OWTGen. PPL: 163.7 -> 144.2Helped
Use HDLM-small-128 instead of GIDD+-smallSmall discrete diffusion language model · OWTValid. PPL: ≤25.82 -> ≤23.25Helped
Use HDLM-small-64 instead of GIDD+-smallSmall discrete diffusion language model · OWTGen. PPL: 170.2 -> 144.2Helped
Use 1 cluster (ablation)HDLM-small · OWTValid. PPL: ≤23.36 -> ≤25.72Hurt
Use 2 clusters (ablation)HDLM-small · OWTValid. PPL: ≤23.36 -> ≤25.79Hurt
Use 4 clusters (ablation)HDLM-small · OWTValid. PPL: ≤23.36 -> ≤25.05Hurt
Use 8 clusters (ablation)HDLM-small · OWTValid. PPL: ≤23.36 -> ≤24.57Hurt
Use 16 clusters (ablation)HDLM-small · OWTValid. PPL: ≤23.36 -> ≤24.17Hurt
Use 32 clusters (ablation)HDLM-small · OWTValid. PPL: ≤23.36 -> ≤23.83Hurt
Use 256 clusters (ablation)HDLM-small · OWTValid. PPL: ≤23.36 -> ≤23.65Hurt
Set cluster perturbation probability ξ to 0.9 (ablation)HDLM-small-64 with force transition · OWTGen. PPL: 144.2 -> 69.76Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: OpenWebText

Benchmarks: OpenWebText validation set

Metrics: validation perplexity generative perplexity

Baselines: MDLM GIDD+ SEDD GPT-2 Llama 110M

Builds on: MDLM GIDD D3PM DiT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy