atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Spiking networks

S$^2$NN: Sub-bit Spiking Neural Networks

NeurIPS 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Spiking networks · approach: Spiking transformers · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Sub-bit Spiking Neural Networks (S²NNs) that encode SNN convolution kernels with compact codebooks (<1 bit per weight), adding outlier-aware quantization (OS-Quant) and membrane-potential feature distillation (MPFD).

Problem

Scaled-up spiking neural networks are costly to store and compute on resource-limited edge devices, and binary SNNs still carry substantial storage and compute demands; sub-bit compression has not been explored for SNNs.

Approach

Constrain each layer's binary kernels to a compact codebook of 2^eta codewords (exploiting kernel clustering in well-trained BSNNs), mitigate outlier-induced codeword selection bias with IQR-based outlier detection and spatially-aware scaling, and distill directly on membrane potentials via normalized Gram matrices.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add OS-Quant to the S$^2$NN baseline (ablation)S$^2$NN · CIFAR-100accuracy: 75.11 -> 75.59 (+0.48)Helped
add LGKD (ablation)S$^2$NN with OS-Quant · CIFAR-100accuracy: 75.59 -> 75.92 (+0.33)Helped
add FRFD (ablation)S$^2$NN with OS-Quant · CIFAR-100accuracy: 75.59 -> 76.71 (+1.12)Helped
add MPFD (ablation)S$^2$NN with OS-Quant · CIFAR-100accuracy: 75.11 -> 78.77 (+3.66)Helped
remove the Gram matrix from MPFD (ablation)MPFD · CIFAR-100accuracy: 78.77% -> 78.32%Hurt
use 0.67-bit rather than 1-bit weightsS$^2$NN on CIFAR-10 · CIFAR-10accuracy: 95.54 -> 96.43 (+0.9)Helped
use 0.67-bit rather than 1-bit weightsS$^2$NN on CIFAR-100 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 78.77 -> 78.77 (+0.0)No clear effect
use 0.44-bit rather than 1-bit weightsS$^2$NN on CIFAR-100 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 78.77 -> 77.40 (-1.4)Hurt
use 0.67-bit rather than 1-bit weightsS$^2$NN on ImageNet-1K · ImageNet-1Kaccuracy: 63.46 -> 68.02 (+4.6)Helped
use 0.44-bit rather than 1-bit weightsS$^2$NN on DVSCIFAR-10 · DVSCIFAR-10accuracy: 81.6 -> 81.3 (-0.3)Hurt
set OS-Quant gamma to 0.5 instead of 1.5 (ablation)OS-Quant · CIFAR-100accuracy: 75.59% -> 74.48%Hurt
set OS-Quant gamma to 3.0 instead of 1.5 (ablation)OS-Quant · CIFAR-100accuracy: 75.59% -> 75.08%Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet-1K DVSCIFAR10 COCO 2017 ADE20K

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet-1K DVSCIFAR10 COCO 2017 ADE20K

Metrics: top-1 accuracy model size (Mbit) OPs (G) mAP@50 mIoU pixel accuracy

Baselines: BitSNN Q-SNN Q-Spikformer BESTformer FP SNN IR-Net SNN sub-bit (ICCV2021) Bi-Real BiBert BinaryViT ProxConnect++ A&B

Builds on: Binary neural network sub-bit compression (kernel clustering) Leaky Integrate-and-Fire neuron Tukey's fences / IQR outlier detection Feature-based distillation for SNNs (firing-rate based)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy