atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Treatment effects

Coupling Generative Modeling and an Autoencoder with the Causal Bridge

NeurIPS 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Treatment effects · approach: Benchmarking treatment effect models · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a generative-model and autoencoder-coupled causal bridge estimator for proxy-variable causal inference, with a bound on bridge approximation error and an extension to survival outcomes.

Problem

Estimating causal treatment effects under unobserved confounding using two proxy sets (treatment and outcome controls), where existing causal bridge estimators are limited in theory and in statistical efficiency with small samples.

Approach

Model the bridge as an integral over p(U|W,x) with a sampler h(W,x,epsilon) learned from a conditional generative model of W; share this sampler in an autoencoder for (X,Z) so the outcome, treatment and treatment-control losses jointly regularize the latent confounder representation; also extend the bridge to a Cox hazard model for survival outcomes.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use p(W|x,z) sampling instead of iterative learningDFPV · Demand and dSpriteMSEHelped
use the generalized causal bridge with h(W,x,epsilon)CB with p(W|x,z) sampling · Demand and dSpriteMSEHelped
add the treatment and control autoencoderCB · Demand and dSprite, especially small sample sizeMSEHelped
use CB + AE instead of CoxPH weighting baselinesFramingham Offspring · Framingham Offspringhazard ratio agreement with RCTHelped
add the autoencoder to CBFramingham Offspring · Framingham Offspringhazard ratio confidence intervalHelped
vary the latent confounder and noise dimensions (ablation)CB + AE shared encoder h · Synthetic datacausal-effect estimateNo clear effect
sample U directly with MCMC instead of using h(W,x,epsilon) (ablation)generalized causal bridge · Synthetic datacausal-effect estimate accuracyHelped
include a KL term and prior p(U) in the CEVAE-based formulation (ablation)CB with CEVAE-style autoencoder · Experiments (settings not specified)prediction reliabilityHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Demand (synthetic) dSprites (synthetic) Framingham Offspring cohort

Benchmarks: Demand dSprites Framingham

Metrics: MSE hazard ratio 95% confidence interval concordance index

Baselines: DFPV CoxPH-Uniform CoxPH-IPW CoxPH-OW CEVAE

Builds on: causal bridge function deep feature proxy variables (DFPV) CEVAE Cox proportional hazards model

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy