atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph self-supervised learning

Hybrid-Collaborative Augmentation and Contrastive Sample Adaptive-Differential Awareness for Robust Attributed Graph Clustering

NeurIPS 2025 · Graph learning › Graph self-supervised learning · approach: Augmentation-free graph learning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes RAGC, a contrastive attributed graph clustering method that jointly augments node-level and edge-level embeddings (HCA) and reweights contrastive pairs by pseudo-label confidence and hard/easy and positive/negative status (CSADA), evaluated on six datasets.

Problem

Contrastive attributed graph clustering relies on node-level augmentation only and treats all contrastive sample pairs equally, limiting discriminability and robustness to noise.

Approach

Combine node-level and edge-level embedding augmentations into a joint similarity that also refines the adjacency, and use high-confidence K-means pseudo-labels to apply a weight modulation function that up-weights hard positives and down-weights hard negatives in the InfoNCE loss.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use RAGC instead of HSANAttributed graph clustering · CORAACC: 77.07±1.56 -> 78.74±0.72Helped
Use RAGC instead of HSANAttributed graph clustering · BATACC: 77.15±0.72 -> 79.77±1.29Helped
Use RAGC instead of HSANAttributed graph clustering · CITEARI: 47.05±1.12 -> 46.51±0.63Hurt
Add dynamic confidence-factor selection instead of static high-confidence sample selection (ablation)RAGC · Six benchmark datasetsclustering performanceHelped
Add HCA (hybrid node- and edge-level augmentation) (ablation)RAGC · Six benchmark datasetsclustering performanceHelped
Add CSADA instead of classical InfoNCE loss (ablation)RAGC · Six benchmark datasetsclustering performanceHelped
Add attribute Gaussian noise and masking in HCARAGC · Graph clustering under attribute noiseaverage degradation: -19.03 -> -11.36Helped
Add CSADA contrastive weightingSCGC and HSAN · Six benchmark datasetsclustering performanceHelped
Vary β and γ across the tested rangesRAGC · Six benchmark datasetsclustering performanceNo clear effect
Increase noise standard deviation or feature-mask ratio excessivelyRAGC · HCA parameter sensitivityACCHurt

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CORA CITESEER AMAP BAT EAT UAT

Benchmarks: CORA CITESEER AMAP BAT EAT UAT

Metrics: ACC NMI ARI F1

Baselines: DAEGC SDCN DFCN ARGA AGE NCLA CCGC GraphLearner GDCL ProGCL HSAN SCGC

Builds on: InfoNCE SCGC HSAN GraphLearner DCRN

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy