atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Human-AI and goal-conditioned

What Makes Good Collaborative Views? Contrastive Mutual Information Maximization for Multi-Agent Perception

AAAI 2024 · Multi-agent systems and games › Human-AI and goal-conditioned · approach: Collaborative multi-agent perception · 12 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CMiMC, which maximizes multi-view mutual information between pre- and post-collaboration BEV features via contrastive learning (CMiMNet) to train an intermediate collaboration encoder for LiDAR 3D object detection.

Problem

Intermediate collaboration in multi-agent perception treats feature fusion as an opaque process trained only on downstream loss, risking loss of discriminative information from individual views.

Approach

Defines multi-view mutual information (MVMI) between one collaborative view and many individual views on global and local scales, and estimates/maximizes it with a JS-divergence contrastive discriminator (CMiMNet) during training only, added to the detection loss.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use CMiMC instead of DiscoNetintermediate collaboration for 3D object detection · V2X-Sim 1.0AP at IoU 0.5: 3.08%Helped
use CMiMC instead of DiscoNetintermediate collaboration for 3D object detection · V2X-Sim 1.0AP at IoU 0.7: 4.44%Helped
add knowledge distillation (ablation)DiscoNet · V2X-Sim 1.0AP at IoU 0.5: 1.41%Helped
add knowledge distillation (ablation)DiscoNet · V2X-Sim 1.0AP at IoU 0.7: 0.19%Helped
compress intermediate features at ratio 1/32 (ablation)CMiMC · V2X-Sim 1.0AP at IoU 0.5: 61.58 -> 59.78Hurt
compress intermediate features at ratio 1/32 (ablation)CMiMC · V2X-Sim 1.0AP at IoU 0.7: 55.80 -> 54.04Hurt
compress intermediate features at ratio 1/32 (ablation)CMiMC · V2X-Sim 1.0communication volume: $1.05\times 10^3$ -> $3.28\times 10^1$Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: V2X-Sim 1.0

Benchmarks: V2X-Sim 1.0

Metrics: average precision at IoU 0.5 average precision at IoU 0.7 communication volume (KB) AP@0.5 under localization noise

Baselines: No Collaboration Early Collaboration Late Collaboration Who2com When2com V2VNet Where2comm DiscoNet V2X-ViT

Builds on: DiscoNet Deep InfoMax Contrastive Multiview Coding MINE InfoNCE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy