atlas

Research map / Image generation / Fast diffusion sampling

Non-equilibrium Annealed Adjoint Sampler

NeurIPS 2025 · Image generation › Fast diffusion sampling · approach: Diffusion theory and learned samplers · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes NAAS, an SOC-based unbiased diffusion sampler whose reference dynamics is an annealed SDE between a Gaussian prior and the target, trained with lean adjoint matching and reciprocal adjoint matching with replay buffers.

Problem

Sampling from an unnormalized density with learned diffusion samplers; existing SOC-based samplers start from uninformative (static or OU) reference dynamics, which limits guidance toward the target and efficiency of learning the control.

Approach

Uses an annealed reference SDE driven by interpolated energy U_t between a Gaussian prior and the target as the base process in an SOC problem, and learns a prior over an extra backward interval [-1,0] with a second control, alternating adjoint matching and reciprocal adjoint matching so the terminal law is exactly the target without importance weighting.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use annealed reference dynamics with learned controls instead of ASNAAS · MW54 (d=5)Sinkhorn: 0.32 $\pm$ 0.06 -> 0.10Helped
use annealed reference dynamics with learned controls instead of CMCD-KLNAAS · Funnel (d=10)MMD: 0.095 $\pm$ 0.003 -> 0.076 $\pm$ 0.004Helped
use annealed reference dynamics with learned controls instead of SMC-ESSNAAS · Funnel (d=10)Sinkhorn: 117.48 -> 132.30Hurt
use annealed reference dynamics with learned controls instead of SCLDNAAS · GMM40 (d=50)Sinkhorn: 3787.73 $\pm$ 249.75 -> $\mathbf{496.48}$ $\pm$ 27.08Helped
use annealed reference dynamics with learned controls instead of DDSNAAS · MoS (d=50)MMD: 0.131 $\pm$ 0.001 -> $\mathbf{0.113}$ $\pm$ 0.070Helped
use annealed reference dynamics with learned controls instead of SCLDNAAS · MoS (d=50)Sinkhorn: 656.10 $\pm$ 88.97 -> $\mathbf{394.55}$ $\pm$ 29.35Helped
replace alternating optimization with joint optimization (ablation)NAAS · MW54Sinkhorn: 0.10 -> 0.20Hurt
replace alternating optimization with joint optimization (ablation)NAAS · MoSSinkhorn: 394.55 -> 597.99Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MW54 Funnel GMM40 MoS alanine dipeptide

Benchmarks: MW54 Funnel GMM40 MoS alanine dipeptide

Metrics: Sinkhorn distance MMD KL divergence Wasserstein distance of energies

Baselines: SMC SMC-ESS CRAFT DDS PIS AS CMCD SCLD

Builds on: Adjoint Matching Adjoint Sampling Denoising Diffusion Sampler Path Integral Sampler SCLD

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy