atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Hierarchical Frequency Tagging Probe (HFTP): A Unified Approach to Investigate Syntactic Structure Representations in Large Language Models and the Human Brain

NeurIPS 2025 · Large language models › Language, safety and interpretability · approach: Linguistic encoding in LLM representations · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces HFTP, a frequency-tagging probe that finds sentence- and phrase-selective MLP neurons in six LLMs and sEEG channels in 26 Chinese speakers, then aligns them via RSA to compare syntactic representations.

Problem

Unclear which computational units in LLMs encode hierarchical syntactic structure and whether they align with human brain mechanisms; prior methods make model-brain comparison of syntax methodologically inconsistent.

Approach

Adapts the hierarchical frequency tagging paradigm (1 Hz sentence, 2 Hz phrase rhythms) to LLM neuron activations and human sEEG via FFT and ITPC, with a word-order-randomized control, then uses SRDM-based RSA to align MLP neurons with brain channels.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Upgrade from Gemma to Gemma 2Gemma family · sEEG-LLM SRDM alignment, sentence and phrase corporaS(m,b) left hemisphere: 0.582 to 0.644 (sentence); 0.575 to 0.628 (phrase)Helped
Upgrade from Llama 2 to Llama 3.1Llama family · sEEG-LLM SRDM alignment, sentence and phrase corporaS(m,b) left hemisphere: 0.645 to 0.514 (sentence); 0.648 to 0.522 (phrase)Hurt
Left-hemisphere alignment vs right-hemisphere alignment of LLMsall six LLMs · sEEG-LLM SRDM alignmentS(m,b)Helped
Word-order randomized control added to the corpus (isolating syntactic contribution)LLM and sEEG analyses · HFTP peak detectionqualitative separation of experiment vs random spectraNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Chinese and English syntactic corpora adapted from Ding et al. Chinese sentence and phrase corpora naturalistic text (dialogue, news, literature, poetry) Chinese and English Wikipedia 8-syllable/word corpora

Metrics: FFT amplitude permutation test 95% CI z-score Spearman correlation top-100 channel model-brain similarity S(m,b) ANOVA

Builds on: hierarchical frequency tagging (Ding et al.) representational similarity analysis knowledge neurons

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy