atlas

Research map / Optimization / Nonconvex and smooth optimization

Semi-infinite Nonconvex Constrained Min-Max Optimization

NeurIPS 2025 · Optimization › Nonconvex and smooth optimization · approach: Complexity of nonconvex first-order methods · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes an inexact dynamic barrier primal-dual method (iDB-PD) for nonconvex min-max problems with nonconvex semi-infinite constraints, proving O(eps^-3), O(eps^-6θ), O(eps^-3θ/(1-θ)) complexities for stationarity, feasibility, and slackness under a Łojasiewicz condition on the squared constraint residual.

Problem

Min-max optimization with infinitely many nonconvex nonlinear constraints (semi-infinite constrained min-max), motivated by adversarial robustness and safety-constrained learning, where existing methods assume convex, easy-to-project constraints or lack the nested max structure.

Approach

Extends the dynamic barrier gradient descent idea to the min-max, semi-infinite setting: the primal step solves a closed-form QP with a barrier-type affine constraint using the estimated worst-case constraint index w_k, and an indicator based on zeta = [psi]_+ ||grad psi|| switches off the dual multiplier when the constraint is treated as inactive, avoiding bounded-dual assumptions; inner maximiza

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use iDB-PD instead of adaptive discretization solved with COOPERRobust multitask learning with task priority · Multi-MNISTinfeasibilityHelped
Use iDB-PD instead of adaptive discretization solved with COOPERRobust multitask learning with task priority · CHD49stationarityHelped
Use iDB-PD instead of GDMA with small ρRobust multitask learning with task priority · Multi-MNISTinfeasibilityHelped
Use iDB-PD instead of GDMA with large ρRobust multitask learning with task priority · CHD49stationarityHelped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Multi-MNIST CHD49 Multi-Fashion MNIST Yeast 20NG

Benchmarks: Multi-MNIST CHD49

Metrics: stationarity infeasibility complementarity slackness objective loss

Baselines: Adaptive discretization (Blankenship and Falk) with COOPER GDMA (gradient descent multi-ascent) on DRO reformulation

Builds on: dynamic barrier gradient descent Lojasiewicz inequality gradient descent ascent

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy