atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Multimodal LLMs

RadarQA: Multi-modal Quality Analysis of Weather Radar Forecasts

NeurIPS 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Multimodal LLMs · approach: Benchmarks and analysis of MLLMs · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces RadarQA, an MLLM (Qwen2.5-VL-7B fine-tuned with LoRA, GRPO, and post-training) for expert-like multi-modal quality analysis of weather radar nowcasts, trained on the new RQA-70K dataset.

Problem

Score-based metrics for weather radar forecast quality (CSI, SSIM) cannot describe structural/dynamic errors or give interpretable, expert-like assessments, and general MLLMs perform poorly on this analysis.

Approach

A four-task paradigm (frame/sequence rating and assessment) backed by a physics-informed attribute library, hybrid human-plus-script annotation, attribute-informed GPT-4o report generation, and a three-stage SFT, GRPO, post-training pipeline with format and accuracy rewards.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Train RadarQA with the multi-stage pipeline (SFT, reinforcement learning, and post-training) rather than the strongest reported baselineQwen-2.5-VL-7B · Frame Ratingaccuracy (Overall): 52.67 -> 61.51Helped
Train RadarQA with the multi-stage pipeline (SFT, reinforcement learning, and post-training) rather than the strongest reported baselineQwen-2.5-VL-7B · Frame AssessmentGPT4Score: 5.89 -> 6.87Helped
Train RadarQA with the multi-stage pipeline (SFT, reinforcement learning, and post-training) rather than the strongest reported baselineQwen-2.5-VL-7B · Sequence Ratingaccuracy (Overall): 36.70 -> 66.17Helped
Train RadarQA with the multi-stage pipeline (SFT, reinforcement learning, and post-training) rather than the strongest reported baselineQwen-2.5-VL-7B · Sequence AssessmentGPT4Score: 5.63 -> 6.58Helped
Add Stage 1 supervised fine-tuning (ablation)RadarQA training pipeline · Rating tasksaverage accuracy: +40% relative improvementHelped
Add Stage 1 supervised fine-tuning (ablation)RadarQA training pipeline · Assessment tasksGPT-4 Score: around 2.5-point increaseHelped
Add Stage 2 reinforcement learning to Stage 1 (ablation)RadarQA training pipeline · Rating and assessment taskstask performanceHelped
Add Stage 3 post-training to Stage 1 (ablation)RadarQA training pipeline · Rating and assessment taskstask performanceHelped
Use the full three-stage training pipeline rather than partial stage combinations (ablation)RadarQA training pipeline · Frame Rating, Frame Assessment, Sequence Rating, and Sequence Assessmenttask performanceHelped
Jointly train across multiple tasks rather than training a separate single-task model (ablation)RadarQA · Each task's respective evaluation settingtask-specific metricHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: SEVIR RQA-70K RawRQA-20K

Benchmarks: RQA-70K validation split out-of-distribution radar reconstruction data (DiffSR, SRViT, U-Net outputs)

Metrics: accuracy BLEU BERTScore ROUGE_L METEOR GPT4Score

Baselines: Qwen2.5-VL-7B Qwen2.5-VL-72B InternVL2.5-8B GPT-4o Claude 3.7 Sonnet Gemini 2.5 Pro o1

Builds on: GRPO Q-Insight LoRA Qwen2.5-VL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy