atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / RL from feedback

Alignment of Large Language Models with Constrained Learning

NeurIPS 2025 · Reinforcement learning › RL from feedback · approach: GRPO stability and variants · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CAID, an iterative dual-based (multi-shot) alignment method that alternates Lagrangian LLM policy maximization (via DPO) with dual subgradient descent, and proves primal-dual and optimality gap bounds up to an LLM parametrization gap, validated on PKU-SafeRLHF and HH-RLHF.

Problem

Constrained LLM alignment in parameter space: maximize a primary reward (helpfulness) subject to constraints on secondary utilities (safety, humor, etc.), where primal-dual policy gradient methods often fail to converge and one-shot dual methods are not optimal in LLM parameter space.

Approach

Iterate between Lagrangian maximization of the LLM policy (via DPO on pseudo-preferences from a composite reward) and dual descent on the multipliers, warm-started from a one-shot solution; theory bounds the primal-dual gap and reward/constraint optimality gaps by the LLM parametrization gap.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use iterative multi-shot dual updates instead of one-shot alignmentSafety alignment of Alpaca-7b-reproduced · PKU-SafeRLHF-30K testconstraint satisfaction across safety thresholdsHelped
Use iterative multi-shot dual updates instead of one-shot alignmentSafety alignment of Alpaca-7b-reproduced · PKU-SafeRLHF-30K testhelpfulness-safety trade-offHelped
Use iterative multi-shot dual updates instead of one-shot alignmentSafety alignment of Alpaca-7b-reproduced · PKU-SafeRLHF-30K testsafety score distributionHelped
Train with safety as the sole objectiveDPO safety-only · PKU-SafeRLHF-30K testhelpfulness-safety trade-offMixed
Train with helpfulness as the sole objectiveDPO helpfulness-only · PKU-SafeRLHF-30K testhelpfulness-safety trade-offMixed
Apply iterative dual-based alignment to two constraintsLLaMA2-7B alignment · Anthropic HH-RLHF testharmlessness and humor constraint satisfactionHelped
Increase harmlessness and humor constraint levelsLLaMA2-7B alignment · Anthropic HH-RLHF testhelpfulness improvementHurt

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PKU-SafeRLHF-30K Anthropic HH-RLHF

Benchmarks: PKU-SafeRLHF-30K test split Anthropic HH-RLHF test split (2000 prompts)

Metrics: average helpfulness score average safety score constraint satisfaction (actual vs. threshold b) helpfulness-safety Pareto trade-off harmlessness and humor improvements

Baselines: one-shot dual-based method DPO_s DPO_h

Builds on: one-shot safety alignment DPO stepwise alignment safe RLHF

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy