atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Quantization

Efficient Multi-bit Quantization Network Training via Weight Bias Correction and Bit-wise Coreset Sampling

NeurIPS 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Quantization · approach: Mixed-precision quantization · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes weight bias correction (sharing BN across bit-widths without calibration) and bit-wise gradient-based coreset sampling to cut the training cost of multi-bit quantization networks.

Problem

Multi-bit quantization networks require full-dataset updates per trained bit-width and extra calibration or fine-tuning to support additional precisions, giving high training overhead.

Approach

Correct quantization-induced shift and scale bias in the quantized weights so that child models at different bit-widths share BN layers (with a separate BN for 1-bit) and need no calibration; then select per-bit-width coresets using TDDS-style gradient/training-dynamics scores computed under a bit-wise training schedule and resampled periodically.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add weight bias correction and bit-wise coreset samplingMulti-bit quantization networks · CIFAR-10/100, TinyImageNet, ImageNet-1Ktraining time: up to 7.88×Helped
Use the proposed method instead of dedicated trainingResNet-50 · ImageNet-1Ktraining time: 5.75×Helped
Add bit-wise coreset samplingDeiT-T · ImageNet-1KGPU hours: 18.22 GPU hours reductionHelped
Add bit-wise coreset samplingDeiT-S · TinyImageNetGPU hours: 8.41×Helped
Add bias correction (ablation)Quantized models · Activation alignment, averaged across bit-widthsMAE: 0.755 to 0.667Helped
Add BN adaptation after bias correction (ablation)Multi-bit quantization networks · Accuracy across bit-widthsaccuracyHelped
Use bit-wise rather than batch-wise TDDS scores for coreset selection (ablation)Any-Precision with Bias Correction · CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 at different pruning ratiosaccuracyHelped
Resample the coreset every epoch rather than every 30 epochs (ablation)PreActResNet-20 · CIFAR-10average accuracy: +1.33%pHelped
Share BN across all bit-widths, including 1-bit, rather than assigning 1-bit its own BN (ablation)PreActResNet-20 · CIFAR-10, 1-bit quantizationaccuracyHurt
Use coreset sampling alone without bias correction and BN adaptation (ablation)Multi-bit quantization networks · CIFAR-10, accuracy across bit-widthsaccuracyHurt
Use a fixed temperature of 0.5 rather than fixed temperatures 0.1 or 1.0 (ablation)PreActResNet-20 · CIFAR-10test accuracyHelped
Dynamically increase sampling temperature from 0.1 to 1.0 rather than use fixed 0.5 (ablation)PreActResNet-20 · CIFAR-10test accuracyHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 TinyImageNet ImageNet-1K

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 TinyImageNet ImageNet-1K

Metrics: per-bit-width accuracy GPU hours

Baselines: Dedicated training Any-Precision Random Entropy Forgetting EL2N Moderate TDDS

Builds on: Any-Precision TDDS DoReFa StatsQ OFQ

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy