atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Zero-/few-shot and meta-learning

UGM2N: An Unsupervised and Generalizable Mesh Movement Network via M-Uniform Loss

NeurIPS 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Zero-/few-shot and meta-learning · approach: Zero-shot robustness and transfer · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes UGM2N, an unsupervised, patch-based graph-transformer mesh movement network trained with a variance-based M-Uniform loss, achieving zero-shot generalization across PDEs and mesh geometries without pre-adapted meshes.

Problem

Mesh movement (r-adaptation) for PDE solvers is computationally expensive with Monge-Ampère methods, and existing supervised learning approaches (M2N, UM2N) need pre-adapted meshes and generalize poorly across PDEs and mesh topologies.

Approach

Process local node patches (a node and its first-order neighbors, normalized to a unit square) with a graph transformer and train unsupervised using an M-Uniform loss that penalizes variance of per-element equidistribution quantities within each patch, so no pre-adapted mesh labels are needed.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use UGM2N instead of the strongest listed baselinemesh adaptation · Poisson, seven test casesER (%): 14.56 vs 15.40; 9.00 vs -5.59; 12.46 vs 9.79; 1.70 vs 1.15; 9.07 vs 11.69; 4.90 vs 5.15; 2.56 vs 1.62Mixed
Use UGM2N instead of the strongest listed baselinemesh adaptation · Helmholtz, five test casesER (%): 14.11 vs 15.60; 13.15 vs 10.29; 15.03 vs 13.48; 14.09 vs 10.87; 16.98 vs 13.50Mixed
Use UGM2N instead of the strongest listed baselinemesh adaptation · Burgers, two initial conditionsER (%): 32.22 vs 44.82; 30.19 vs 51.12Hurt
Increase training data from 10,440 to 41,760 patches (ablation)UGM2N · PoissonER (%): 5.21 to 7.43Helped
Increase training data from 10,440 to 41,760 patches (ablation)UGM2N · HelmholtzER (%): 9.94 to 14.21Helped
Increase training data from 10,440 to 41,760 patches (ablation)UGM2N · BurgersER (%): 30.07 to 30.56Mixed
Add clip-to-boundary projection (ablation)UGM2N · Burgers and Poisson/Helmholtz test casesER (%): Burgers0: 32.22 -> 35.27; Poisson4: 1.70 -> 15.98Helped
Add clip-to-boundary projection (ablation)UGM2N · Burgers1ER (%): 30.19 -> 30.18No clear effect
Add clip-to-boundary projection (ablation)UGM2N · Non-convex meshestangling ratio: 0%No clear effect
Vary the M-Uniform loss scaling parameter λ (ablation)UGM2N · PDE adaptation casesERNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: four analytical flow fields on a triangular mesh with random node perturbations

Benchmarks: Poisson equation (7 solutions) Helmholtz equation (5 solutions) Burgers equation (2 initial conditions) NACA0012 airfoil cylinder flow wave equation on circular domain moving cylinder supersonic flow over wedge non-convex mesh tangling test 1,000 random polygonal domains

Metrics: error reduction (ER) tangling ratio (TR) MAE of Cp and C_D L_var on adapted mesh mesh movement time

Baselines: MA method M2N UM2N

Builds on: UM2N M2N Monge-Ampère mesh adaptation Graph Attention Network PINNs

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy