atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Submodular and game algorithms

Tight Bounds on the Distortion of Randomized and Deterministic Distributed Voting

NeurIPS 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Submodular and game algorithms · approach: Committee voting rules · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Tightens metric distortion bounds for distributed (two-stage, group-based) voting under four average/max cost objectives, for deterministic and randomized in-group/over-group rules in general metric spaces.

Problem

Distortion of distributed voting where n voters in k groups select local representatives that are then aggregated, under four cost objectives (avgavg, avgmax, maxavg, maxmax); prior bounds were loose or open, especially for randomized mechanisms.

Approach

Shows that a Pareto-efficient in-group rule yields an avgmax bound of 2β+3 independent of the in-group distortion, introduces a Bias Tournament construction for lower bounds, and analyzes random dictatorship / uniform selection mechanisms to obtain tight randomized bounds.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use a Pareto-efficient in-group rule instead of the previous general in-group boundDeterministic distributed voting · General metric spaces, avgmaxdistortion upper bound: 11 to 7Helped
Use the Arbitrary Dictator mechanism for general metricsDeterministic distributed voting · General metric spaces, maxmaxdistortion upper bound: 5 to 3Helped
Use the Bias Tournament lower-bound constructionDeterministic distributed voting · General metric spaces, maxavgdistortion lower bound: $2 + \sqrt{5}$ to 5Helped
Use a deterministic in-group rule with distortion 3 and randomized uniform over-group selectionranddet · General metric spaces, avgavgdistortion: $5-\frac{2}{k}$Helped
Use a Pareto-efficient in-group rule and uniform over-group selectionranddet · General metric spaces, avgmaxdistortion upper bound: 5 to 3Helped
Use Random Dictatorship in-group and uniform over-group selectionrandrand · General metric spaces, avgavgdistortion upper bound: $3-\frac{2}{kn^*}$Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: distortion

Baselines: Plurality Matching Arbitrary Dictator alpha-in-beta-over mechanism Random Dictatorship

Builds on: Plurality Matching Plurality Veto Random Dictatorship alpha-in-beta-over mechanism Arbitrary Dictator

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy