atlas

Research map / Bandits and online learning / Online convex optimization and games

No-Regret Learning Under Adversarial Resource Constraints: A Spending Plan Is All You Need!

NeurIPS 2025 · Bandits and online learning › Online convex optimization and games · approach: Best-of-both-worlds bandit algorithms · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Studies online resource allocation and online learning with resource constraints under adversarially changing reward/cost distributions, using a spending plan as the benchmark-defining guide, and gives primal-dual no-regret methods with a robust variant for small per-round budgets.

Problem

Online decision making under resource (budget) constraints when reward and cost distributions change adversarially; without a spending plan, sublinear regret is impossible, so regret is measured against baselines that follow a given per-round spending plan.

Approach

Uses a spending plan (per-round expected budget) as the reference for both dynamic and fixed baselines; a black-box primal-dual scheme with dual online mirror descent (and a primal regret minimizer for OLRC) achieves regret scaling with 1/rho_min, plus a meta-procedure that caps rho_min at rho/T^{1/4} and rescales the plan to get T^{3/4} regret.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Provide a spending plan with a well-balanced per-round budget (larger \rho_{\min})ORA and OLRC primal-dual methods · Online decision making with resource constraintsregret bound: \widetilde{O}(\frac{1}{\rho_{\min}}\sqrt{T})Helped
Use the spending plan to guide decisions and constrain the comparator to follow itORA and OLRC · Adversarially changing reward and cost distributionsregret: sublinear regretHelped
Cap the minimum per-round budget and rescale the spending planDual Algorithm for ORA · ORA with arbitrarily small \rho_{\min}dynamic regret: \widetilde{O}(T^{3/4})Helped
Use a bandit-feedback primal regret minimizer instead of a full-feedback onePrimal-Dual Algorithm for OLRC · OLRC with bandit feedbackstatic regret: almost identical resultsNo clear effect
Allow the baseline to deviate from the spending plan by per-round errorsDual Algorithm for ORA · ORA with spending-plan deviationdynamic regret: \frac{1}{\rho_{\min}}\sum_{t=1}^{T}\sum_{i\in[m]}\epsilon^{(i)}_tHurt

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: dynamic regret static regret

Baselines: dynamic optimum OPT_D fixed optimum OPT_H adversarial bandits with knapsacks primal-dual methods

Builds on: bandits with knapsacks EXP3.IX online mirror descent

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy