atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

UMA: A Family of Universal Models for Atoms

NeurIPS 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Scalable approximation and equivariant compute · 72 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Trains a family of universal atomistic models (UMA, S/M/L) on ~500M atomic systems across materials, molecules, catalysis, molecular crystals and MOFs, using a Mixture of Linear Experts (MoLE) and a two-stage direct-then-conservative training schedule.

Problem

Machine learning interatomic potentials are typically trained per domain on small datasets; a single model that is accurate and fast across diverse DFT tasks (materials, molecules, catalysis, molecular crystals, MOFs) remains an open problem.

Approach

Scale a single eSEN/eSCN-based equivariant MLIP across five merged DFT datasets using Mixture of Linear Experts whose expert weights depend only on global system information (composition, charge, spin, task), so experts can be merged before MD, keeping inference cost near that of a dense model; combined with a BF16-then-FP32 two-stage training recipe and empirical scaling laws.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MoLE rather than a dense model for multi-task UMA-S (ablation)UMA-S · Multi-task trainingvalidation lossHelped
Train multi-task without MoLE rather than single-task (ablation)small dense models · Multi-task trainingvalidation lossHurt
Increase MoLE experts from 1 to 8 (ablation)UMA-S · Multi-task traininglossHelped
Increase MoLE experts from 8 to 32 (ablation)UMA-S · Multi-task traininglossHelped
Increase MoLE experts from 32 to 128 (ablation)UMA-S · Multi-task traininglossNo clear effect
Use multi-task rather than single-task training (ablation)UMA-L · Pre-training across taskslossMixed
Use reduced max neighbors in pretraining, then effectively infinite max neighbors in finetuning (ablation)UMA · Final model performanceperformance, energy conservation, and smoothnessNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: OMat24 OMol25 OC20++ OMC25 ODAC25 OC22 OC25 OPoly26 MPtrj sAlex

Benchmarks: Matbench Discovery WBM OC20 S2EF AdsorbML OMol25 OOD-Comp OMol25 PDB-TM OMC25 test CSP Blind Test 7th ODAC OOD MDR phonon elastic tensor NVE MD

Metrics: MAE F1 success rate steps per second Kendall rank lattice energy error

Baselines: eSEN-30M-OMat eqV2-OMat eqV2-OC20 GemNet-OC20 eSEN-sm-cons. eSEN-S-OMC Orb-v3 MACE-MPA-0 SevenNet-MF-ompa GRACE-2L-OAM

Builds on: eSEN eSCN convolution OC20 / OMat24 / OMol25 datasets Chinchilla-style compute-optimal scaling laws

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy