atlas

Research map / Video / Video-language understanding

SafeVid: Toward Safety Aligned Video Large Multimodal Models

NeurIPS 2025 · Video › Video-language understanding · approach: Video LLMs with fine-grained understanding · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Builds SafeVid-350K, a 350K-pair video safety preference dataset generated via textual video descriptions and LLM-written chosen responses, aligns VLMMs with DPO, and introduces the SafeVidBench benchmark.

Problem

Video large multimodal models fail to transfer static (text/image) safety alignment to video contexts, a phenomenon termed mismatched generalization; there is little video-specific safety preference data or benchmarking.

Approach

Use detailed textual video descriptions as an interpretive bridge so that LLMs (GPT-4) can apply text-based safety guidelines to generate video-specific chosen responses, forming a large DPO preference dataset with rejected responses from an unsafe VLMM.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
DPO-align LLaVA-NeXT-Video on SafeVid-350KLLaVA-NeXT-Video · SafeVidBench-BaseSafety Rate (Avg.): 53.99 -> 96.38; +42.39%Helped
DPO-align Qwen2.5-VL-7B on SafeVid-350KQwen2.5-VL-7B · SafeVidBench-BaseSafety Rate (Avg.): 77.03 -> 95.87; +18.84Helped
DPO-align LLaVA-NeXT-Video on SafeVid-350KLLaVA-NeXT-Video · SafeVidBench-ChallengeSafety Rate (Avg.): 46.23 -> 85.94; +39.71%Helped
DPO-align Qwen2.5-VL-7B on SafeVid-350KQwen2.5-VL-7B · SafeVidBench-ChallengeSafety Rate (Avg.): 59.78 -> 89.78; +30.00Helped
DPO-align LLaVA-NeXT-Video on SafeVid-350KLLaVA-NeXT-Video · VLBreakBench BaseAttack success rate: 68.00% to 16.48%Helped
DPO-align LLaVA-NeXT-Video on SafeVid-350KLLaVA-NeXT-Video · VLBreakBench ChallengeAttack success rate: 63.84% to 43.57%Helped
DPO-align LLaVA-NeXT-Video on SafeVid-350KLLaVA-NeXT-Video · MM-SafetyBench SD+TYPOSafety Rate: 42.02% to 74.31%Helped
DPO-align LLaVA-NeXT-Video on SafeVid-350KLLaVA-NeXT-Video · HarmEvalSafety Rate: 74.73% to 94.00%Helped
DPO-align LLaVA-NeXT-Video on SafeVid-350KLLaVA-NeXT-Video · StrongRejectHelpful Rate: 66.67 -> 100Helped
DPO-align LLaVA-NeXT-Video on SafeVid-350KLLaVA-NeXT-Video · MMBench-VideoMean perception score: 0.975 to 1.11Helped
DPO-align LLaVA-NeXT-Video on SafeVid-350KLLaVA-NeXT-Video · MMBench-VideoMean reasoning score: 1.14 to 0.99Hurt
DPO-align Qwen2.5-VL on SafeVid-350KQwen2.5-VL · MMBench-VideoMean perception score: 1.3125 to 1.2725Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: InternVid-10M-FLT SafeVid-350K MMBench-Video MM-SafetyBench VLBreakBench miniJailBreakV-28K HarmEval StrongReject

Benchmarks: SafeVidBench-Base SafeVidBench-Challenge VLBreakBench MM-SafetyBench miniJailBreakV-28K HarmEval StrongReject MMBench-Video

Metrics: Safety Rate Helpful Rate attack success rate

Baselines: Claude-3.5-sonnet GPT-4o GPT-4o-mini Gemini-2.0-flash Gemini-1.5-pro LLaVA-OneVision Qwen2.5-VL-72B InternVL2.5-78B MiniCPM-o 2.6 InternVideo2.5-Chat-8B

Builds on: DPO InternVid VideoCLIP 3H principles LLaMA-Factory

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy