atlas

Research map / 3D vision / 3D generation

Urban Region Embedding via Multi-View Contrastive Prediction

AAAI 2024 · 3D vision › 3D generation · approach: Learning 3D reconstruction from images · 35 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ReCP, a multi-view contrastive prediction model that learns consistent urban region embeddings from POI and taxi mobility views via intra-view contrastive/reconstruction losses and inter-view contrastive and dual prediction objectives.

Problem

Urban region representation learning from multiple views (POI attributes and human mobility) typically fuses views only after separate encoding, failing to learn consistent representations across views.

Approach

Replaces posterior attention-based fusion with a consistency learning paradigm: maximize mutual information between attribute and mobility view representations (contrastive) and minimize conditional entropy via dual prediction networks, combined with intra-view contrastive learning and autoencoder reconstruction to avoid trivial solutions.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use ReCP instead of ReMVCUrban region embeddings · Manhattan land use clusteringNMI: 0.761* ± 0.02 -> 0.780 ± 0.01Helped
Use ReCP instead of ReMVCUrban region embeddings · Manhattan land use clusteringARI: 0.455* ± 0.04 -> 0.483 ± 0.01Helped
Use ReCP instead of ReMVCUrban region embeddings · Manhattan land use clusteringF-measure: 0.462* ± 0.04 -> 0.499 ± 0.02Helped
Use ReCP instead of HREPUrban region embeddings · Manhattan region popularity predictionMAE: 217.52* ± 10.98 -> 195.16 ± 18.70Helped
Use ReCP instead of HREPUrban region embeddings · Manhattan region popularity predictionRMSE: 318.41* ± 14.54 -> 291.19 ± 20.04Helped
Use ReCP instead of HREPUrban region embeddings · Manhattan region popularity predictionR²: 0.585* ± 0.04 -> 0.652 ± 0.05Helped
Add intra-view contrastive learning (ablation)ReCP · Land use clustering and region popularity predictionPerformanceHelped
Add intra-view reconstruction loss (ablation)ReCP · Land use clustering and region popularity predictionPerformanceHelped
Add inter-view learning (ablation)ReCP · Manhattan land use clusteringARI: 29.84%Helped
Add inter-view learning (ablation)ReCP · Manhattan region popularity predictionR²: 4.00%Helped
Add inter-view dual prediction loss (ablation)ReCP · Land use clustering and region popularity predictionPerformanceHelped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NYC Open Data POI data NYC taxi trip records (Feb 2014) NYC check-in data

Benchmarks: Manhattan land usage clustering (29 districts) Manhattan region popularity prediction (check-in counts)

Metrics: NMI ARI F-measure MAE RMSE R^2

Baselines: HDGE ZE-Mob MV-PN CGAL MVURE MGFN ReMVC HREP

Builds on: ReMVC contrastive learning information bottleneck-style mutual information maximization

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy