atlas

Research map / Image generation / Fast diffusion sampling

Learning to Integrate Diffusion ODEs by Averaging the Derivatives

NeurIPS 2025 · Image generation › Fast diffusion sampling · approach: Fast diffusion ODE solvers · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes secant losses that learn the average velocity (secant) of diffusion PF-ODEs via Monte Carlo integration and Picard iteration, enabling few-step generation by fine-tuning or distilling EDM and SiT.

Problem

Slow diffusion inference: numerical ODE solvers degrade badly below ~10 steps, while distillation methods are costly, complex, and unstable.

Approach

Model the secant (average of tangents/velocities between two times) with a neural network, trained with integral-derived losses that use Monte Carlo sampling of an intermediate time and Picard-style estimation of the unobserved point; the regression targets are the diffusion target or the teacher velocity, avoiding explicit derivatives used by consistency models.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add guidance interval to STEISTEI · ImageNet-256×256, 4 stepsFID: 2.78 -> 2.27Helped
add guidance interval to STEISTEI · ImageNet-256×256, 8 stepsFID: 2.36 -> 1.96Helped
add guidance interval to STEESTEE · ImageNet-256×256, 4 stepsFID: 3.02 -> 2.55Helped
add guidance interval to STEESTEE · ImageNet-256×256, 8 stepsFID: 2.33 -> 1.96Helped
set λ from 0.1 to 1.0 (ablation)STEI · ImageNet-256×256, 4 stepsFID: 3.96 -> 2.84Helped
set λ from 1.0 to 2.0 (ablation)STEI · ImageNet-256×256, 4 stepsFID: 2.84 -> 3.96Hurt
use discrete, generation-only t and s sampling instead of adding continuous sampling or inversion capability (ablation)SDEI and STEI · ImageNet-256×256FIDHurt
sample r uniformly instead of using biased sampling toward t, s, or the midpoint (ablation)secant losses · CIFAR-10 and ImageNet-256×256FIDHelped
use interior-point estimation rather than end-point estimation (ablation)secant losses · CIFAR-10 and ImageNet-256×256FIDHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 ImageNet-256x256

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 ImageNet-256x256

Metrics: FID IS

Baselines: DPM-Solver DPM-Solver++ UniPC DEIS LD3 Flow-DPM-Solver Consistency Training/Distillation (iCT) IMM Shortcut Models CTM MeanFlow

Builds on: EDM SiT consistency models classifier-free guidance guidance interval

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy