atlas

Research map / Video / Video generation

VMDT: Decoding the Trustworthiness of Video Foundation Models

NeurIPS 2025 · Video › Video generation · approach: Compositional text-to-video diffusion · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces VMDT, a unified trustworthiness benchmark for text-to-video and video-to-text foundation models across safety, hallucination, fairness, privacy, and adversarial robustness, evaluating 7 T2V and 19 V2T models.

Problem

Video foundation models lack a comprehensive, unified trustworthiness benchmark covering both T2V generation and V2T understanding, unlike text and image modalities.

Approach

Extends the MMDT image-modality trustworthiness framework to video, adding video-specific risks (temporal risk, physical harm), a temporal hallucination scenario, and video-based fairness, privacy (location inference, memorization), and adversarial datasets, evaluated with GPT-4o and Qwen2.5-VL-72B judges.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use larger models within the same V2T model classV2T models · hallucination scenariosaccuracyHelped
Use larger models within the same V2T model classV2T models · adversarial inputsrobustness: P-value = 0.034Helped
Use larger models within the same V2T model classV2T models · fairnessunfairnessHurt
Use larger V2T modelsV2T models · location inferenceprivacy inference score: Pearson Corr = 0.544, P-value = 0.016Hurt
Use larger V2T modelsV2T models · overkill fairnessoverkill fairness OHelped
Evaluate T2V models with transformed rather than vanilla safety promptsT2V models · safetyHGRHelped
Use gradient-based rather than greedy or genetic adversarial attacksT2V models · adversarial robustnessaverage performance drop: 5.0% vs -0.9% and 0%Hurt
Use greedy rather than gradient-based adversarial attacksT2V models · adversarial robustnessaverage performance drop: -0.9%No clear effect
Use genetic rather than gradient-based adversarial attacksT2V models · adversarial robustnessaverage performance drop: 0%No clear effect
Generate safety prompts in transformed scenarios rather than vanilla scenariosT2V models · safetyHGRHelped
Scale up a V2T modelV2T models · trustworthiness dimensions overalltrustworthinessMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: VATEX CLEVRER Neptune WebVid-10M BDD100k Casual Conversation First Impression V2 MMDT SafeWatch-Bench T2VSafetyBench

Benchmarks: VMDT

Metrics: bypass rate harmful content generation rate accuracy fairness score F1 fairness score F2 overkill fairness O l2 distance cosine similarity performance drop Pearson correlation

Baselines: VideoCrafter2 CogVideoX-5B OpenSora 1.2 Vchitect-2.0 Luma Pika Nova Reel GPT-4o Claude-3.5-Sonnet Nova Pro

Builds on: MMDT DecodingTrust SafeWatch-Bench T2VSafetyBench

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy