atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

BiggerGait: Unlocking Gait Recognition with Layer-wise Representations from Large Vision Models

NeurIPS 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Representation geometry and collapse · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes BiggerGait, a layer-wise gait recognition baseline that extracts gait representations from every (or grouped) intermediate layer of frozen-or-tuned large vision models (DINOv2, CLIP, SAM) and fuses them, with only a mask auto-encoder as gait prior.

Problem

Existing LVM-based gait recognition relies heavily on hand-crafted gait priors and uses only the final LVM layer, underexploiting the rich representations across intermediate layers.

Approach

Treat each LVM layer as a separate gait representation source: use a lightweight auto-encoder silhouette mask as the only gait prior, attach a per-layer gait encoder, and fuse layer outputs at test time via ensemble distance; a grouping variant (BiggerGait*) shares encoders across depth groups to cut cost.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Fuse layer-wise representations using ensemble testing instead of relying on a single layerBiggerGait · CCPG and cross-domain gait evaluationrank-1 accuracy: +7.7% on DINOv2-S, +10.3% on CLIP-S, and +7.0% on SAM-SHelped
Use intermediate layers rather than the final layerLVM gait representations · CCPGaverage rank-1 accuracy: 89.5% ... Layer 6; ... final layer ... 80.9%Helped
Use ensemble testing across layersBiggerGait · CCGR_MINIrank-1 accuracyHurt
Use P=2 shared gait encoders instead of P=12 (ablation)BiggerGait* with DINOv2-S · CCPGrank-1 accuracy (CL): 89.8 -> 89.5No clear effect
Use P=1 shared gait encoder instead of P=12 (ablation)BiggerGait* with DINOv2-S · CCPGrank-1 accuracy (CL): 89.8 -> 86.3Hurt
Use J=6 depth groups instead of J=12 (ablation)BiggerGait* with DINOv2-S · CCPGrank-1 accuracy (CL): 89.5 -> 89.0No clear effect
Use J=3 depth groups instead of J=12 (ablation)BiggerGait* with DINOv2-S · CCPGrank-1 accuracy (CL): 89.5 -> 88.8Hurt
Apply depth and gait grouping to larger LVMs (ablation)BiggerGait with SAM-L, CLIP-L, and DINOv2-L · CCPGrank-1 accuracy (CL): 90.0 -> 89.0; 87.5 -> 85.6; 92.8 -> 92.7Hurt
Use layer-wise representations instead of the single-level BigGait designDINOv2-S gait recognition · CCPG train; multi-dataset evaluationaverage rank-1 accuracy: 53.0 -> 67.0Helped
Use layer-wise representations instead of the single-level BigGait designDINOv2-S gait recognition · CCGR_MINI train; multi-dataset evaluationaverage rank-1 accuracy: 73.7 -> 78.1Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CCPG CCGR_MINI

Benchmarks: CCPG CCGR_MINI SUSTech1K CASIA-B*

Metrics: Rank-1 accuracy Rank-5 accuracy parameters FLOPs

Baselines: GaitSet GaitPart GaitGL GaitBase DeepGaitV2 BiFusion SkeletonGait++ XGait MultiGait++ GaitEdge BigGait

Builds on: BigGait GaitBase DINOv2 CLIP SAM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy