atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Open-set and few-shot detection

Triple Feature Disentanglement for One-Stage Adaptive Object Detection

AAAI 2024 · Detection and segmentation › Open-set and few-shot detection · approach: Domain-adaptive object detection · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Triple Feature Disentanglement (TFD), a one-stage SSD-based domain adaptive object detector that disentangles domain-invariant and domain-specific features via a multi-level module, cyclic SPP-attention module, and categorical feature module.

Problem

Domain adaptive object detection where simple feature disentanglement leaves residual domain-specific information in domain-invariant representations, and prior disentanglement work is built on two-stage detectors.

Approach

Disentangles features in three phases: a Multi-level Disentanglement Module with a Re-disentanglement Block for DIR, a Cyclic Disentanglement Module with SPP Attention to extract DSR and push it away from DIR, and a Categorical Features Disentanglement Module that aligns per-class features across domains at multiple scales.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add triple feature disentanglementSSD · Pascal VOC to Clipart1KmAP: 40.4 -> 41.2Helped
add triple feature disentanglementSSD · Pascal VOC to Watercolor2KmAP: 53.5% to 55.0%Helped
add triple feature disentanglementSSD · Pascal VOC to Comic2KmAP: 32.9% to 34.4%Helped
add simple disentanglement (ablation)SSD · Clipart1KmAP: 26.7 -> 35.6Helped
add Re-disentanglement Block (ablation)SSD with simple disentanglement · Clipart1KmAP: 35.6 -> 37.9Helped
add Cyclic Disentanglement Module (ablation)SSD with RB · Watercolor2KmAP: 52.2 -> 53.6Helped
add CFDM part 1 (ablation)SSD with CDM · Comic2KmAP: 33.1 -> 33.7Helped
add CFDM part 2 (ablation)SSD with CFDM part 1 · Clipart1KmAP: 39.9 -> 41.2Helped
use three RBs instead of the full method's RB configuration (ablation)TFD · Watercolor2KmAP: 55.0 -> 54.7Hurt
use two RBs instead of the full method's RB configuration (ablation)TFD · Clipart1KmAP: 41.2 -> 41.0Hurt
set CDM time step to 1 instead of 2 (ablation)TFD · Watercolor2KmAP: 55.0 -> 54.2Hurt
set CDM time step to 3 instead of 2 (ablation)TFD · Comic2KmAP: 34.4 -> 34.1Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Pascal VOC Clipart1K Watercolor2K Comic2K

Benchmarks: Clipart1K Watercolor2K Comic2K

Metrics: mAP@0.5

Baselines: Source Only WST BSR BSR+WST SWDA HTCN I3Net DBGL IDF AT LODS CMT

Builds on: SSD VDD orthogonal loss gradient reversal layer SWDA Spatial Pyramid Pooling

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy