atlas

Research map / Time series / Causal and generative time series

Structured Linear CDEs: Maximally Expressive and Parallel-in-Time Sequence Models

NeurIPS 2025 · Time series › Causal and generative time series · approach: Neural differential equations · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces SLiCEs, a framework of structured input-dependent linear CDE state-transition matrices (block-diagonal, sparse, Walsh-Hadamard, DPLR, diagonal) that keep maximal probabilistic expressivity while reducing cost, and evaluates them on A5 state tracking, regular language tasks, and UEA time series.

Problem

Parallel-in-time sequence models (SSMs, linear RNNs) are expressively limited, especially diagonal ones that cannot state-track, while dense linear CDEs that are maximally expressive are computationally infeasible at scale.

Approach

Replace the dense state-transition matrix of a linear neural CDE with structured input-dependent matrices (block-diagonal, sparse, or Walsh-Hadamard times diagonal) and prove they retain maximal probabilistic expressivity while cutting parameters and cost; block-diagonal is the most practical, combining efficient parallel scans and a chunk-wise diagonal part.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace the Log-NCDE nonlinear vector field with a block-diagonal linear vector fieldLog-NCDE · UEA-MTSCA (six datasets)test accuracy: 64.3 -> 64.0No clear effect
Replace the Log-NCDE nonlinear vector field with a block-diagonal linear vector fieldLog-NCDE · UEA-MTSCA (six datasets)time per 1,000 training steps: 1321.7 -> 68.1Helped
Use a block-diagonal state-transition structure instead of diagonal state-transition matricesSLiCE · A5 state-tracking benchmarkminimum stacked layers for validation accuracy greater than 90%Helped
Use a block-diagonal state-transition structure instead of Walsh-Hadamard structureSLiCE · Regular language tasksaverage validation accuracy: 64.5 -> 83.8Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: A5 state-tracking benchmark formal language benchmark (Chomsky hierarchy regular tasks) UEA Multivariate Time-Series Classification Archive (six datasets)

Benchmarks: A5 state tracking A5 length generalisation formal language regular tasks UEA-MTSCA six datasets

Metrics: validation accuracy test accuracy minimum stacked layers training time per 1k steps GPU memory

Baselines: LSTM xLSTM DeltaNet Gated DeltaProduct RWKV-7 Transformer S4D Mamba Log-NCDE LRU S5 S6

Builds on: Log-NCDE DeltaNet S4D Mamba Neural Rough Differential Equations

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy