atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Communication-efficient FL

FedRTS: Federated Robust Pruning via Combinatorial Thompson Sampling

NeurIPS 2025 · Federated learning and privacy › Communication-efficient FL · approach: Efficient local training in FL · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FedRTS, a federated dynamic pruning framework that adjusts sparse topologies via combinatorial Thompson sampling (TSAdj) over Beta posteriors per weight, reducing communication by uploading only top-gradient indices.

Problem

Federated pruning with dynamic sparse training suffers from greedy, unstable topology adjustments under data heterogeneity and partial client participation, plus high communication cost from uploading full gradients.

Approach

Reframe topology adjustment as a combinatorial multi-armed bandit and replace deterministic magnitude-based pruning/regrowth with Thompson sampling over per-weight Beta posteriors updated from fused individual and aggregated outcomes; clients upload only top-K-kappa gradient indices.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use FedRTS instead of the best baselineResNet18 · CIFAR-10accuracy: 5.1%Helped
Use FedRTS instead of a SOTA frameworkResNet18 · CIFAR-10communication cost: 33.3% reductionHelped
Use FedRTS instead of federated pruning baselinesGPT-2-32M · TinyStoriesperplexityHelped
Use FedRTS instead of baselines as data heterogeneity increasesFedRTS · CIFAR-10 and TinyStories, varying data heterogeneityaccuracyHelped
Use FedRTS instead of baselines at lower client participationFedRTS · CIFAR-10, varying client participationaccuracyHelped
Exclude aggregated information from probability updates (ablation)FedRTS · CIFAR-10, various target densitiesaccuracyNo clear effect
Add individual information to aggregated information through fusion (ablation)FedRTS (γ = 1) · CIFAR-10, various target densitiesaccuracyHelped
Use probabilistic rather than deterministic topology adjustment (ablation)FedRTS without TS (γ = 1) · CIFAR-10, various target densitiesaccuracyHelped
Add farsighted historical information (ablation)FedTiny · CIFAR-10, various target densitiesaccuracyHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CINIC-10 TinyImageNet SVHN TinyStories

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 CINIC-10 TinyImageNet SVHN TinyStories

Metrics: accuracy perplexity communication cost ratio training FLOPs

Baselines: PruneFL FedTiny FedDST FedSGC FedMef FedAVG

Builds on: PruneFL FedTiny FedDST FedMef combinatorial Thompson sampling

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy