atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph self-supervised learning

FoGE: Fock Space inspired encoding for graph prompting

NeurIPS 2025 · Graph learning › Graph self-supervised learning · approach: LLMs and graph foundation models · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FoGE, a parameter-free graph encoder based on Fock-space/VSA-style operations (circular convolution binding, vector addition superposition) and uses a single linear adapter to prefix-tune a frozen Llama2-7B for graph question answering across simple graphs, hypergraphs, and proteins.

Problem

Encoding diverse graph structures (simple graphs, hypergraphs, proteins) into embeddings that a frozen LLM can use for graph question answering, without task-specific or heavy trainable graph encoders.

Approach

A parameter-free, nearly lossless graph embedding built from random high-dimensional vectors for nodes, combining edges via circular convolution (product) and summing them (superposition), with only a linear adapter trained on top of a frozen LLM as a prefix.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use FoGE-LLM instead of GraphTokenLlama2 (7B) graph prompting · GraphQA: number of edgesaccuracy: 42.6% -> 45.1%Helped
Use FoGE-LLM instead of GraphTokenLlama2 (7B) graph prompting · GraphQA: cycle existenceaccuracy: 95.6% -> 97.9%Helped
Use FoGE-LLM instead of GraphTokenLlama2 (7B) graph prompting · GraphQA: number of nodesaccuracy: 99.6% -> 97.2%Hurt
Use FoGE-LLM instead of GraphTokenLlama2 (7B) graph prompting · GraphQA: edge existenceaccuracy: 73.8% -> 74.3%Helped
Add molecular fingerprint features to FoGE (ablation)FoGE on mol-HIV · mol-HIVROC-AUC: 0.7614±0.0051 -> 0.8305±0.0068Helped
Use FoGE-LLM instead of few-shot textual graph promptingLlama2 (7B) graph prompting · HyperGraphQA: number of nodesaccuracy: 16.8% -> 85.0%Helped
Use FoGE-LLM instead of GraphLLMLlama2 graph prompting · GraphReasoning: substructure countaccuracy: 99.9% -> 97.3%Hurt
Use RoBERTa vectors instead of random vectors (ablation)FoGE-LLM · GraphReasoning: bipartite matchaccuracy: 98.1% -> 97.3%Hurt
Use RoBERTa vectors instead of random vectors (ablation)FoGE-LLM · GraphReasoning: max triplet sumaccuracy: 94.6% -> 94.7%Helped
Use RoBERTa vectors instead of random vectors (ablation)FoGE-LLM · GraphReasoning: shortest pathaccuracy: 95.7% -> 95.8%Helped
Increase FoGE vector dimensionality (ablation)FoGE on GraphQA · GraphQA tasksaccuracyMixed
Use one linear adapter per layer instead of a single input-layer adapter (ablation)FoGE-LLM · graph promptingperformanceNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: GraphQA GraphReasoning HyperGraphQA Jaffe PPI OBNB SabDab mol-HIV

Benchmarks: GraphQA GraphReasoning HyperGraphQA Jaffe mol-HIV PPI OBNB

Metrics: accuracy ROC-AUC micro F1 APOP MSE inference time

Baselines: GraphToken GraphLLM zero-shot prompting few-shot prompting GCN GAT GraphSAGE DGI GRACE Node2Vec GCNII LabelProp

Builds on: GraphToken GraphLLM prefix-tuning vector symbolic architectures HRRFormer

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy