atlas

Research map / Large language models / Agents, code and math

CellVerse: Do Large Language Models Really Understand Cell Biology?

NeurIPS 2025 · Large language models › Agents, code and math · approach: LLMs for scientific discovery · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces CellVerse, a multiple-choice QA benchmark that converts single-cell multi-omics data into text (cell2sentence and GRN-based statements) and evaluates 14 open and closed LLMs on cell type annotation, drug response prediction, and perturbation analysis.

Problem

Whether LLMs can reason about cell biology when single-cell data are expressed as natural language QA, which has not been systematically evaluated.

Approach

Reformulate single-cell analysis at cell, drug, and gene levels as multiple-choice QA by serializing expression profiles as cell sentences and gene-regulatory relations as text, then benchmark a wide range of generalist and specialist LLMs under zero- and few-shot prompting.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use generalist LLMs instead of specialist C2S-Pythia modelsCellVerse evaluation · Cell type annotation, drug response prediction, and perturbation analysisprediction performanceHelped
Increase model capacity within evaluated LLM familiesLLMs evaluated on CellVerse · CellVerse tasksprediction performanceHelped
Increase context length by including more gene namesGPT-4 family · Cell type annotation, CITE-seqaccuracyHelped
Increase context length by including more gene namesDeepSeek family · Cell type annotation, CITE-seqaccuracyMixed
Add few-shot examplesLLMs evaluated on CellVerse · Single-cell analysis tasksperformanceMixed
Use LLMs for drug response prediction rather than random guessingLLMs evaluated on CellVerse · Drug response prediction, scRNA-seqaccuracy: 55%No clear effect
Use LLMs to predict perturbation direction rather than assess perturbation significanceLLMs evaluated on CellVerse · Perturbation analysis, scATAC-seqaccuracy: 76.67% vs 62.96%Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: scRNA-seq multiple sclerosis data CITE-seq PBMC data ASAP-seq PBMC data erlotinib scRNA-seq drug response data K562 scATAC-seq perturbation data

Benchmarks: CellVerse

Metrics: precision recall F1 accuracy

Baselines: C2S-Pythia-160M C2S-Pythia-410M C2S-Pythia-1B Qwen-2.5-7B Qwen-2.5-32B Qwen-2.5-72B Llama-3.3-70B DeepSeek-V3 DeepSeek-R1 GPT-4 GPT-4o-mini GPT-4o

Builds on: cell2sentence gene regulatory network

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy