atlas

Research map / Optimization / Nonconvex and smooth optimization

Adaptive Algorithms with Sharp Convergence Rates for Stochastic Hierarchical Optimization

NeurIPS 2025 · Optimization › Nonconvex and smooth optimization · approach: Stochastic convex optimization complexity · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Ada-Minimax and Ada-BiO, parameter-free adaptive momentum-normalized SGD methods for stochastic nonconvex-strongly-concave minimax and nonconvex-strongly-convex bilevel problems, with high-probability rates that adapt to unknown gradient noise.

Problem

Stochastic hierarchical (minimax and bilevel) optimization lacks convergence guarantees that adapt to unknown stochastic gradient noise levels; existing methods are suboptimal across noise regimes unless the noise magnitude is known.

Approach

Combine normalized SGD with momentum for the upper-level variable, using a noise-aware adaptive momentum parameter estimated online from gradient differences, with AdaGrad-Norm stepsizes for the lower-level variable, so the rate O~(1/sqrt(T)+sqrt(sigma)/T^{1/4}) is achieved without knowing the noise level.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use Ada-Minimax instead of TiAdaminimax optimization · stochastic minimax convergencegradient norm rateHelped
use Ada-Minimax instead of PDSMtwo-layer Transformer on Sentiment140 · trainingAUC: +20% AUCHelped
use Ada-Minimax instead of PDSMtwo-layer Transformer on Sentiment140 · testAUC: +2% AUCHelped
reduce stochastic gradient noiseAda-Minimax · synthetic minimax functionconvergence speedHelped
use Ada-Minimax instead of TiAda under high noisesynthetic minimax function · noise magnitude σ=100convergenceHelped
vary α within [0.1, 2.0] (ablation)Ada-Minimax · deep AUC maximizationconvergence speed and final AUCNo clear effect
vary η_y between 0.001 and 0.05 (ablation)Ada-Minimax · deep AUC maximizationAUC curveNo clear effect
vary η_x from 0.001 to 0.01 (ablation)Ada-Minimax · deep AUC maximizationfinal performanceNo clear effect
increase η_x to 0.05 (ablation)Ada-Minimax · deep AUC maximizationfinal training AUCHurt
vary γ within [0.01, 2.0] (ablation)Ada-Minimax · deep AUC maximizationperformanceNo clear effect

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Sentiment140 synthetic 1-D function f(x,y)=cos x + xy - y^2/2

Benchmarks: synthetic 1-D minimax function Sentiment140 deep AUC maximization hyperparameter optimization

Metrics: gradient norm training AUC test AUC running time

Baselines: TiAda SGDA PDSM

Builds on: normalized SGD with momentum AdaGrad-Norm TiAda Neumann series hypergradient approximation

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy