atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Multiclass Loss Geometry Matters for Generalization of Gradient Descent in Separable Classification

NeurIPS 2025 · Optimization › Implicit bias and generalization · approach: Stability-based generalization analysis · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Studies finite-time generalization of unregularized gradient descent on separable multiclass linear classification, showing risk depends on the smoothness norm p of the loss template (log k for p=∞ vs linear k for p=2, with a matching L2 lower bound).

Problem

Finite-time generalization of unregularized gradient descent for separable multi-class linear classification, and how risk bounds depend on the number of classes k and on the loss template's geometry rather than only its decay rate.

Approach

Shows that multiclass GD risk bounds depend on the loss template's smoothness with respect to the L_p norm, not just its tail decay: the p-dependent factor k^{2/p} in bounds, a new low-noise Rademacher complexity bound for vector-valued predictors, and step size tuned via template smoothness.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use a larger smoothness norm index p for the loss templateGradient Descent for separable multiclass classification · Separable multiclass classificationpopulation risk upper-bound dependence on k: k^{\frac{2}{p}}Helped
Use an L_∞-smooth template instead of an L_2-smooth templateGradient Descent with exponentially-tailed losses · Separable multiclass classificationpopulation risk dependence on k: logarithmically on k; linear dependence on the number of classesHelped
Use cross-entropy, whose template is smooth w.r.t. L_∞Gradient Descent · Separable multiclass classificationpopulation risk upper bound: \widetilde{O}\left( \frac{1}{\margin^2T}+ \frac{1}{\margin^2n}\right)Helped
Use an L_2-smooth template with exponential decayGradient Descent · Separable multiclass classificationpopulation risk lower bound: \widetilde {\Omega}\left( \frac{k}{\margin^2T}+ \frac{k}{\margin^2n}\right)Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: population risk bounds

Baselines: Lei and Ying (2020) VVP Rademacher bounds Li et al. (2018) VVP bounds Richards and Kuzborskij (2023) binary GD bounds

Builds on: PERM framework local Rademacher complexity binary smooth-loss GD generalization bounds

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy