atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Variational and generative sampling

When Models Don’t Collapse: On the Consistency of Iterative MLE

NeurIPS 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Variational and generative sampling · approach: Score-based generative modeling analysis

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Theoretical analysis of iterative MLE trained on accumulating real plus synthetic data, showing non-asymptotic consistency under standard smoothness/regularity assumptions and constructing counterexamples where collapse occurs quickly despite MLE consistency.

Problem

Whether model collapse is avoidable when MLE is iteratively retrained on accumulating data (real plus synthetic), and under which assumptions; prior analyses reached conflicting conclusions about its severity.

Approach

Uses a Taylor-expansion/telescoping argument on the stationary-point conditions of the cumulative log-likelihood to show that iterative MLE parameters stay within O(sqrt(log(d/δ)/n)) of ground truth when n is polylogarithmic in T; complements this with constructions of TV-consistent families where collapse happens after one or arbitrarily many iterations.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Satisfy the stated regularity, smoothness, and Fisher information assumptions during accumulating-data iterative MLEIterative MLE · Iterative MLE, iteration Tparameter error: \norm{\thetait{T}-\theta^{\star}}\leq C \sqrt{\frac{\log\left(\frac{4d}{\delta}\right)}{n}}Helped
Accumulate synthetic data with a TV-consistent but highly non-smooth distribution familyIterative MLE · Accumulating-data iterative MLE, iteration 2total variation distance: \operatorname{TV}\left(p_{\theta^{\star}}, p_{\thetait{2}}\right) \geq CHurt
Use a fixed TV-consistent family that violates the positive-result assumptionsIterative MLE · Accumulating-data iterative MLE, some iteration Ttotal variation distance: \operatorname{TV}\left(p_{\thetait{T}}, p_{\theta^{\star}}\right) \geq \frac{3}{8}Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: parameter error norm total variation distance KL divergence

Builds on: Shumailov et al. model collapse asymptotic normality of MLE Bernstein-type matrix Azuma concentration

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy