atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph algorithms and clustering

Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Selection via Hypothesis Testing on Reliability Graphs

NeurIPS 2025 · Graph learning › Graph algorithms and clustering · approach: Continuous DAG structure learning

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes RG-PT, a multi-objective hyperparameter selection method that builds a reliability DAG via Bradley-Terry scores and non-negative Lasso and applies DAGGER FDR-controlling testing, outperforming LTT and PT in prompt engineering and translation.

Problem

Hyperparameter selection (e.g., LLM prompt templates) that balances reliability constraints with cost objectives while retaining formal FDR guarantees and exploiting known structural reliability relations among candidates.

Approach

Model hyperparameter reliability as a DAG (reliability graph) learned from held-out data and prior pairwise preferences (Bradley-Terry scores for depth, non-negative Lasso for edges), then run DAGGER graph-structured FDR-controlling testing so that multiple configurations at the same depth are tested in parallel, enlarging the reliable set beyond the linear ordering used by Pareto testing.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use RG-PT instead of LTT or PTprompt selection · Sentiment analysis, sentence similarity, and word in contextshortest reliable prompt lengthHelped
use RG-PT instead of LTT or PTtranslation hyperparameter selection · WMT16 Romanian-Englishtest ROUGE-LHelped
use RG-PT instead of LTT or PTimage detection hyperparameter selection · MS-COCOobject recallHelped
use RG-PT instead of LTT or PTSVM hyperparameter selection · Fashion MNISTtest recall: 0.727 -> 0.332Helped
use RG-PT instead of LTT or PTSVM hyperparameter selection · Fashion MNISTtest classification error: 0.267 -> 0.286Hurt
vary RG depth D from 1 to 100 (ablation)RG-PT · Prompt Engineeringaverage shortest reliable prompt lengthMixed
vary RG depth D from 1 to 100 (ablation)RG-PT · Prompt Engineeringtest FDRNo clear effect
increase the fraction of flipped pairwise priors f (ablation)RG-PT · Prompt Engineeringshortest reliable prompt lengthHurt
increase the fraction of flipped pairwise priors f (ablation)RG-PT · Prompt Engineeringtest FDRNo clear effect
use highly corrupted priors with f > 0.6 (ablation)RG-PT · Prompt Engineeringnumber of selected promptsHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Instruction Induction Stanford Sentiment Treebank Semantic Textual Similarity Benchmark Word-in-Context WMT16 Romanian-English MS-COCO Fashion MNIST

Benchmarks: Instruction Induction WMT16 Romanian-English MS-COCO Fashion MNIST

Metrics: average prompt length of shortest reliable prompt FDR ROUGE-L recall classification error

Baselines: LTT PT

Builds on: Learn-then-Test Pareto Testing DAGGER Benjamini-Hochberg fixed sequence testing

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy