atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Knowledge and temporal graphs

Aeolus: A Multi-structural Flight Delay Dataset

NeurIPS 2025 · Graph learning › Knowledge and temporal graphs · approach: Continuous-time dynamic graph learning

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces Aeolus, a multi-modal flight delay dataset (tabular, flight chains, flight network graphs) from BTS and Meteostat with temporal splits, and benchmarks tabular, sequential, and graph models on it.

Problem

Existing flight delay datasets are small, geographically narrow, flat, leak future information, or are not publicly available, which limits research on delay propagation and generalizable tabular learning.

Approach

Aligns three modalities built from raw flight operations and weather data: a flat tabular table for over 50 million flights, per-aircraft flight chains linked by tail-number over a 24-hour window, and a flight network graph connecting flights via shared airport, aircraft, and crew resources; evaluated with temporal splits.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add VGAE flight-network embeddings to AFMAFM flight delay classifier · Aeolus ARR delay graph classificationAUC: 0.6723 -> 0.6794Helped
Add DeepWalk flight-network embeddings to AFMAFM flight delay classifier · Aeolus ARR delay graph classificationAUC: 0.6723 -> 0.6765Helped
Replace DeepWalk embeddings with VGAE embeddingsAFM flight delay classifier · Aeolus ARR delay graph classificationAUC: 0.6765 -> 0.6794Helped
Use random split instead of temporal split (ablation)Tabular models on Aeolus ARR delay prediction · Aeolus ARR delay predictionAUC: +0.057 average AUCHelped
Use random split instead of temporal split (ablation)Tabular models on Aeolus ARR delay prediction · Aeolus ARR delay predictionACC: 0.688 -> 0.688; 0.708 -> 0.724; 0.750 -> 0.782; 0.763 -> 0.758; 0.679 -> 0.783; 0.772 -> 0.798; 0.772 -> 0.728Mixed
Train on moderate disruption instead of severe disruption months (ablation)COVID-19 ARR delay models · Post-disruption validationAUC: +0.023Helped
Train on moderate disruption instead of severe disruption months (ablation)COVID-19 ARR delay models · Post-disruption validationACC: +0.038Helped
Use FTTransformer rather than the other tested tabular modelsTabular ARR delay regression · Aeolus ARR delay regressionMSE: 0.914Helped
Use TabulaRNN rather than the other tested tabular modelsTabular delay classification · Aeolus ARR and DEP delay classificationACC: 0.772/0.761Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: BTS flight records 2016-2024 Meteostat weather data

Benchmarks: Aeolus tabular benchmark Aeolus flight chain benchmark Aeolus flight network benchmark

Metrics: MSE MAE AUC ACC CRPS Recall Precision F1

Baselines: MLP ResNet AutoInt FTTransformer Tangos TabulaRNN SAINT LSTM GRU CNN-LSTM MogrifierLSTM AFM

Builds on: Mambular AFM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy