atlas

Research map / Optimization / Nonconvex and smooth optimization

An Adaptive Algorithm for Bilevel Optimization on Riemannian Manifolds

NeurIPS 2025 · Optimization › Nonconvex and smooth optimization · approach: Penalty and implicit-gradient bilevel methods · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes AdaRHD, a fully adaptive (inverse cumulative gradient norm step size) double-loop algorithm for deterministic Riemannian bilevel optimization with a geodesically strongly convex lower level, achieving O(1/epsilon) iteration complexity without problem-specific constants.

Problem

Riemannian bilevel optimization requires knowing strong convexity, Lipschitz, and curvature constants to set step sizes, which are often unknown or costly to estimate.

Approach

Adapts the Euclidean D-TFBO inverse-cumulative-gradient-norm step size strategy to Riemannian manifolds for both the lower-level solver and the hypergradient linear system (GD or tangent-space CG), with a trigonometric distance bound handling curvature, and extends to retraction mappings.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use fully adaptive step sizes instead of problem-specific fixed step sizesAdaRHD versus RHGD · AFEW validation, initial step sizes 5, 1, or 0.5convergence to validation accuracyHelped
use conjugate gradient instead of gradient descent to solve the linear systemAdaRHD · AFEW validation, 85% accuracytime: 1488.26 (426.67) -> 1217.06 (635.57); 421.99 (88.31) -> 245.63 (72.42); 477.49 (120.17) -> 241.54 (33.09); 546.18 (66.68Helped
set initial step sizes to 1 or 2 rather than other tested initializationsAdaRHD variants · AFEW validationtraining performanceHelped
replace exponential mappings with retraction mappings (ablation)AdaRHD · Riemannian bilevel optimizationiteration complexity: \mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{T}\right) -> \mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{T}\right)No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: AFEW

Benchmarks: AFEW (5% subset, SPD hyper-representation) simple Stiefel/SPD matrix similarity problem

Metrics: upper-level objective hypergradient estimation error validation accuracy time to reach validation accuracy standard deviation over 5 seeds

Baselines: RHGD-50 RHGD-20 RieBO

Builds on: D-TFBO RHGD AdaGrad-Norm RieBO

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy