atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Treatment effects

Transferring Causal Effects using Proxies

NeurIPS 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Treatment effects · approach: Latent-variable causal inference · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes identifying and estimating a target-domain interventional causal effect under an unobserved discrete confounder using only a proxy in the target domain, via source-domain proxy invertibility and two estimators (causal and reduced parametrisation).

Problem

Estimating a confounded causal effect Q(Y|do(x)) in an unseen target domain where the confounder's distribution shifts across domains and only a proxy W of the confounder is observed in the target domain.

Approach

Under latent shift with a discrete confounder and a proxy whose conditional P(W|E,x) has full row rank, the target interventional distribution is identified as P(y|E,x) P(W|E,x)^† Q(W); two consistent estimators are built from this, one with asymptotic normality and confidence intervals.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use causal parametrisation instead of reduced parametrisationProposed estimators · Simulation point estimationabsolute estimation error: 0.058 -> 0.040Helped
Use the reduced estimator instead of NoAdjHotel searches · Hotel searches, 18 target domainsaverage absolute error: 0.051 -> 0.044Helped
Use the reduced estimator instead of NoAdj*Hotel searches · Hotel searches, 18 target domainsaverage absolute error: 0.080 -> 0.044Helped
Use the reduced estimator instead of WAdjHotel searches · Hotel searches, 18 target domainsaverage absolute error: 0.053 -> 0.044Helped
Use the reduced estimator instead of WAdj*Hotel searches · Hotel searches, 18 target domainsaverage absolute error: 0.075 -> 0.044Helped
Use the reduced estimator instead of NoAdjHotel searches · Hotel searches, 18 target domainsmedian confidence interval length: 0.17 -> 0.14Helped
Use bootstrap normal-approximation confidence intervals instead of the proposed asymptotic intervalsReduced parametrisation estimator · Simulation coverage of confidence intervalsempirical coverage closeness to nominal levelHelped
Use bootstrap normal-approximation confidence intervals instead of the proposed asymptotic intervalsReduced parametrisation estimator · Simulation confidence intervalsconfidence interval lengthHurt
Increase the condition number of P(W|E,x)Causal and reduced estimators · Simulation point estimationabsolute estimation errorHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Expedia Hotel Searches

Benchmarks: Expedia Hotel Searches (randomized-ranking oracle) simulated discrete SCMs

Metrics: absolute estimation error confidence interval coverage confidence interval length average absolute error vs oracle

Baselines: NoAdj NoAdj* WAdj WAdj* oracle

Builds on: proximal causal inference latent shift assumption matrix adjustment method covariate adjustment formula

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy