atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Multimodal LLMs

HoPE: Hybrid of Position Embedding for Long Context Vision-Language Models

NeurIPS 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Multimodal LLMs · approach: VLM capability analysis · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes HoPE, a multimodal RoPE that zeroes the lowest temporal frequencies (hybrid frequency allocation) and scales visual temporal indices dynamically in training and inference, improving long-video understanding and retrieval of Qwen2-based VLMs.

Problem

VLMs degrade on long-context inputs, especially long videos, and existing multimodal RoPE frequency allocations for 3D (t,x,y) positions rely on heuristics and may fail to preserve semantic similarity over long contexts.

Approach

Allocate high frequencies to interleaved x,y and set the lowest frequencies for temporal dimension to zero (NoPE-style), justified by a semantic-preference theory; add dynamic bidirectional temporal scaling factors sampled during training and selected at inference.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use HoPE instead of the strongest reported baselineQwen2-7B-Video · MLVU 32kscore: 62.51 -> 63.85Helped
Use HoPE instead of the strongest reported baselineQwen2-7B-Video · LongVideoBench 32kscore: 53.82 -> 55.34Helped
Use HoPE instead of the strongest reported baselineQwen2-7B-Video · Video-MME 32kscore: 59.13 -> 59.44Helped
Use HoPE instead of the strongest reported baselineVLM · V-NIAHaccuracy: 52.00 -> 63.56Helped
Increase temporal allocation from 16 to 32 dimensions, reducing spatial allocations from 24 each to 16 each (ablation)HoPE · LongVideoBenchscore: 54.11 -> 52.68; 55.09 -> 52.73; 55.34 -> 53.01; 51.22 -> 46.32Hurt
Use larger test-time temporal scaling factors (ablation)HoPE · LongVideoBench 32kscore: 54.36 (0.50) -> 55.70 (1.25)Helped
Use smaller test-time temporal scaling factors (ablation)HoPE · V-NIAHaccuracy: 61.78 (1.50) -> 63.56 (0.75)Helped
Add hybrid frequency allocation (HFA) to the 3D positional structure (ablation)HoPE · Video-MME, all reported context lengthsscore: average improvement of 1.69Helped
Add dynamic temporal scaling (DTS) (ablation)HoPE · Video-MME, 8k to 64kscoreHelped
Use a 3D positional structure instead of vanilla RoPE's flattened 1D positions (ablation)Vanilla RoPE · Multimodal video tasksperformanceHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LLaVA-Video-178k

Benchmarks: LongVideoBench Video-MME MLVU V-NIAH

Metrics: accuracy

Baselines: Vanilla RoPE M-RoPE VideoRoPE

Builds on: RoPE M-RoPE VideoRoPE NoPE

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy