atlas

Research map / Large language models / Reasoning and chain of thought

Diversity-Aware Policy Optimization for Large Language Model Reasoning

NeurIPS 2025 · Large language models › Reasoning and chain of thought · approach: RL with verifiable rewards for reasoning · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that solution diversity correlates with a new Potential@k metric across 12 LLMs and proposes R1-zero-Div, which adds a token-level entropy term applied only to positive samples in GRPO, gaining 3.5% average Pass@1 on four math benchmarks.

Problem

Diversity's role in RL for LLM reasoning is underexplored; standard R1-zero/GRPO training can collapse solution diversity and entropy, limiting exploration and final reasoning performance.

Approach

A token-level entropy objective (reformulated via expected log-likelihood with importance sampling) that avoids length bias of sequence-level entropy, applied only to correct (positive) samples in the GRPO group, since the gradient for low-probability tokens would otherwise promote incorrect solutions.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add token-level diversity objective to positive samples (λ=0.01)R1-zero with Qwen2.5-Math-7B · Four mathematical benchmarks (average)Pass@1 accuracy: 61.0 -> 64.4Helped
Add token-level diversity objective to positive samples (λ=0.01)R1-zero with Qwen2.5-Math-7B · GSM8K testDiv-Equ: 75.02 -> 79.29Helped
Set diversity weight to λ=0.02 on positive samples instead of λ=0.01 (ablation)R1-zero with Qwen2.5-Math-7B · Four mathematical benchmarks (average)Pass@1 accuracy: 64.4 -> 62.8Hurt
Set diversity weight to λ=0.05 on positive samples instead of λ=0.01 (ablation)R1-zero with Qwen2.5-Math-7B · Four mathematical benchmarks (average)Pass@1 accuracy: 64.4 -> 61.7Hurt
Apply diversity objective to negative samples as well as positive samples (ablation)R1-zero with Qwen2.5-Math-7B · Four mathematical benchmarks (average)Pass@1 accuracy: 64.4 -> 63.2Hurt
Apply positive-sample diversity objective (λ=0.01) to Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B (ablation)R1-zero with Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B · Four mathematical benchmarksPass@1 accuracy: 56.1 -> 57.4Mixed
Apply positive-sample diversity objective (λ=0.01) to Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B (ablation)R1-zero with Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B · Olympiad BenchPass@1 accuracy: 32.1 -> 32.0Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: GSM8K MATH

Benchmarks: GSM8K MATH500 OlympiadBench College Math GPQA Diamond

Metrics: Pass@1 Avg@8 Potential@k Div-Equ Div-N-gram Div-Self-BLEU

Baselines: R1-zero SimpleRL-Zoo Eurus-2-7B-PRIME Qwen2.5-Math-7B

Builds on: GRPO DeepSeek-R1 R1-zero DAPO SimpleRL-Zoo

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy